Jump to content

Bigblue204

Members
  • Posts

    7,819
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Bigblue204

  1. Gray, simonese, peterman. There are 3. Plus one or 2 FA. Seems like a pretty quick fix.
  2. I haven't seen anything suggesting Johnson or Davis end up there. And Carter would be fairly cheap.
  3. Count me as someone who thinks Santos Knox is the best value WIL on the market. Mostly due to his age. Saying that, I think the bombers already have his replacement on roster.
  4. Pretty sure he's a FA too
  5. Not sure how I feel about ellingson...
  6. That's basically what I said...if the bombers lose out, it won't be because they didn't try, it'll be because the other offers are just too good to refuse.
  7. I don't think the bombers can be out bid for Chungh. It's just a matter of where HE wants to play, he basically has his pick of teams...its just who is willing to pay equal or more then the bombers.
  8. These jerseys are....interesting....?
  9. 12 yards to get the ball back?? That's seems a bit too easy. I don't mind this rule, but should have been at least 15.
  10. Wtf....just play touch football already
  11. After next season? Who gives a **** about 2020? Its 2019. Bighill is the reigning MODP and you'd rather have someone else cause he might not be good in a few years? Lol...that honestly just doesnt sense.
  12. "Collaros is better anyways!"
  13. Honestly never even considered this. But might not be a bad pick up. Another big mauler type, and gives Gray/Spooner some more time to develop.
  14. Now that I think about it, that is likely a damn near certainty considering how "fortunate" the argos are at grabbing big name players via FA or trade.
  15. I agree with all of this except for the Roosevelt. Injury and age along with his likely fairly large $$$ make me hesitant he would be worth it. Burnham absolutely, if not Walker.
  16. Good, maybe you'll stop asking questions you know damn well no one here has the answers to.
  17. I don't know. You should ask the CFLPA why they suggested starting in March. If they were unhappy with the lack of negotiations, the CFLPA would be in the media saying so. The only thing they've said so far is they would like to start in March.
  18. Exactly. Nothing has changed in terms of what the league can bring to the table when it comes to $$$. The players will not be getting a huge raise...they likely know this as well. The fact that the CFLPA are the ones suggesting to start AFTER free agency speaks volumes about what they are expecting if you ask me. It'll be a fairly quick negotiation.
  19. If TO got that amount, the CFL might consider a 2nd franchise in the big smoke.
  20. Stadium deals has nothing to do with the commish. And I don't know, maybe it's just me. But typically when I think of "progressive" my mind goes to things that are rather new or haven't been tried before. Not doing very similar things the league and other commissioners have tried multiple times with varying degrees of success.
  21. @jamienye .@CFLPA has expressed to the league indicating they want to begin negotiations in early March on a new Collective Bargaining Agreement. #CFL Thanks odd. Considering the insiders on this site that keep saying it's the commishs world wide adventure that has stopped the negotiations from taking place...hhhmm..
  22. I'm fairly sure Randle was moved out to make room for Bighill and Jeffcoat.
  23. Interesting about Jefferson. But call me skeptical the bombers have enough $ to sign him and a big name Rec. I'm wondering if the FA receivers are waiting to see how the QB situation plays out before they sign. Burnham would have a big year if he lands on the same team as Reilly or Bo.
  24. Pederson is still around...
×
×
  • Create New...