BBlink

Not sure what the zip had to do with it. There isn't a world where he should throw that.

What a terrible decision by Zach there. Are you joking

Outside of the one throw (which arguably Demski could have come back a bit) he's been fine.

Lapo and Henoc spending halftime talking about how Calgary has shut down Brady and Zach. I mean sure they've done alright but that is not the story of the game

Two drives that could have ended in a TD and didn't. One pick six. But overshadowing all that is our piss poor defense

Ball thrown and the defensive player had yet to make a step toward a tackle. Then goes and hits Zach

Early season and Calgary loses on a regular week, at home, to Ottawa. Then they are expected to beat the Bombers? Just wondering if these folks are paying attention at all or just going by who is the most rested.

Isn't Weitz to the PR to get Oliveira back on?

We can beat Calgary without BO. I like the idea of splitting reps or even just making BO the backup. Bring Vanterpool back on and let Peterson roll.

Collaros was pinpoint on his throws which was awesome to see. It looked to me (as someone who isn't really a football guy so take it for what it's worth) that Edmonton was playing extremely close to the line on first down and running downhill. Wish we would have stretched their defense out on first down a bit more. But credit to the Elks D. Kyrie Wilson and Tony Jones had great games, not so much Kramdi (making tackles after getting beat). D-line, didn't seem like they were getting a tonne of pressure. DBs...too many breakdowns. Not sure what was happening there. Was great to see Bonds make a big play in a game like that but sucks it was called back. Not the best game but it was a short week. I think that shone through a bit. Happy with how the team rallied in the 4th with the gale force winds at their back.

Out game planned by a country mile

And by 9000 fans it's actually the first 1000 karens that take 9 towels.

I don't completely disagree. Thought Wallace was okay. But Vanterpool is better, and to your point, makes it easier on Kolo in the middle. A bit of a multiplier bonus there.

Edmonton has some talent on the D line. Next week we'd better bring our best on the O-Line

Oh hell yeah Parker was great tonight. He looked promising last game but just needed to get settled in to the new position. He's still learning. Still might get better (if that's possible) The DBs were fantastic in general. Defense was pretty darn good. Offense...I don't really want to talk about it.

Hate the Riders but I think right now I hate the Argos more. I hope the Argos go 0-18. I'm fine with this.

Toronto took a shot in Harris in retribution. Could get really dirty out there.

The only thing that makes sense to me is that Bailey isn't 100 percent (maybe a nagging injury from TC. He was hurt at one point) and they are being cautious with him.

Really like Cooley coming on to take some of the pressure off of Peterson and to give BC a different look. Thunder and Lightning

Wonder if White just wasn't happy being on the PR. It can happen with vets.

Oh yeah. Special teamer for sure. Can play safety in a pinch which is all we'd ask from him. Unfortunately we got bit pretty bad with the injuries to Haggerty and Kelly.

Had to think about this for a bit but it really makes the most sense. We have enough DB depth with Griffin and Hallett. We would only have to start playing with the ratio on offense if Peterson gets hurt. Then we have the option of Chris Ike or Logan depending on how the game is going and we can put in Wallace, Eli or Corcaron to manage the ratio.

Full team effort tonight. All 3 sides of the ball. Vaval is lightning in a bottle. Wheatfall is turning into a star. On defense...well, did Holm get a pass thrown in his direction? Didn't notice him which is usually a good thing. We won without our starting QB and RB. Rourke completed some passes where we were in good position but just misplayed it a bit. Looked easily correctable. Would say the score flattered BC. Go Blue

Is there something about our schemes where we value a glut of DTs over having rotations at DE? Do we think we can just pull LBs down to the end position if need be?

Yeah probably should have expected this. Going into the first game they want some consistency.