Jump to content

Atomic

Members
  • Posts

    10,572
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by Atomic

  1. No, no, I agree, I want more investigation. I'm just saying the "We found water!!!" proclamation could be a little premature. There is still enough doubt that one day we could hear the "Well there was a 99% chance the evidence indicated water was present, but here's why we misunderstood." Just a tad premature is all I'm saying. They haven't discovered water yet.
  2. Lapo had tons of experience before he was hired too.
  3. True. But according to them, its pretty clear. No one has yet walked over and scooped up a handful of wet sand. But splitting hairs. Thats why we *need* to do just that. I don't call it splitting hairs. Either they found water or they didn't. They didn't. It is exciting but there are still unanswered questions here. I will reserve my total excitement until they have actual liquid water.
  4. Hold on they did not find water. They found evidence that indicates strongly that there is water.
  5. But Adams is allowed the yard from the line of scrimmage. He CAN move. Unless you're insinuating the rule should be changed? No I'm insinuating that he moved off the LOS. He's more than a yard away from the line judge when the ball comes up and the LJ should be on the LOS to get the right angle. He moved off with the 1/2 step he took back, but with the LOS being the 37 1/2 yard line, his right foot was on on the 38 when the ball was snapped. He was only about 1/2 yard off the LOS (which is allowed) regardless of where the side judge was standing. I'm going from the loop I saw on twitter after the game showing the LJ pointing while Adams was moving then Adams settling down and taking a half step back. CFL and TSN game logs say 37 yard line. Of course that could be 37 1/2. I can't find the loop anymore, do you have a link? CFL has already admitted it was a blown call so not sure what the argument is about at this point. It is black and white. The officials blew it. End of story.
  6. 5 years from now you'll be telling us we shouldn't be signing Mark Scheifele to an 8 year extension because he'll be 35 at the end of it. When does it end? When can we start thinking about the present?
  7. SNES civ 1 was the first civ I ever played. What an awesome game.
  8. Should have tested Thibault more but to write him off as some kind of scrub is bordering on willful ignorance. He was one of the top rated DBs in his draft and ran the fastest 40 at the combine IIRC. Second year Cdn receiver vs second year Cdn defensive back. Not as much of a mismatch as he's trying to make it out to be.
  9. "Never. I... My daughter. She has to cover her face. She's a.... woman."
  10. You know...sometimes, I don't even understand what you're saying. You respond to comments and it just doesn't make sense. Why won't you just acknowledge that your option has changed to accepting
  11. That actually is a pretty good movie, I think I might watch it today.
  12. I was at the game (via free tickets) and I found it very entertaining. I'm glad it wasn't a blowout. Bad result, good game.
  13. That's a pretty ignorant point of view. How do you know you wouldn't have liked it if you've never had it? Check your privilege bro.
  14. Unless we win 5 straight after
  15. We should just stop learning??? I don't understand that POV.Learning is nice, but have we really gotten anywhere with our expanded knowledge? New tech, same old evil. I like indoor plumbing and electricity. I consider these to be good things.
  16. No I'm saying that your plan of stopping all progress until we stop killing each other just means stopping all progress because we'll never stop killing each other. The "we shouldn't do X until we have world peace, end starvation, etc etc" viewpoint is just silly, IMO.
  17. Good news either way. Not a huge fan of the other parties' plans to raise taxes across the board. NDP said corporate taxes will go up and Liberals said the top tax bracket would increase. Was there anything else? Have you seen the Liberal spending plan? No way they pay for that by "raising taxes for the top 1%" as they say.
  18. The difference is that going to Mars may actually be achievable. Your fairy tale is not.
  19. Good news either way. Not a huge fan of the other parties' plans to raise taxes across the board.
  20. Can't see the Bruins trading away any defencemen at this point
  21. Yeah and it makes you a bad person
  22. lol yes. Everything that has gone on in the last few years, and "Wear Gold Day" is the all time low. How silly.
  23. Tons. The Canadian aspect of the roster and the draft are what make the league more than just a "B League" where NFL washouts go. If they eliminated the ratio I'd be a lot less inclined to follow the league.
  24. I can get on board with that
  25. I'd be surprised, shocked really, if they have found water on Mars. That would be quite the news.
×
×
  • Create New...