Deiter Fan

Fajardo has a better deep ball than Collaros and ots not even close

Collaros looks like crap. 

He looked like this enough last season also. I guess those Dru Brown vs Zach Collaros topics weren’t a thing. 

I really don’t want to be right about Brown/Collaros but my god it’s like when they let Danny Mac go to keep Dunnigan all over again. 

ZC does not look like he's very comfortable.. 

Who was the brainiac who thought that Collaros didn't need to get some reps in preseason, take a bow this is what you get

Everyone was wondering why it was so subdued earlier before the game... The bombers have shown why in two quarters.  Absolutely embarrassing display so far.

Collaros winning this race to the bottom for now...

Kick returner is underwhelming so far. 

what a ******* lame duck pass. jesus christ

Well I missed the first quarter at work, just got home. Guess there’s no point in watching from the beginning lol. This appears to suck. 

Yeah. With low contact practices they are slower action than ever. Messes up the timing and flow. 

This first quarter is not instilling me with any type of confidence here. 

Last 2 times Zach vs fajardo. Fajardo has been the better QB. 

what an ugly ******* start to the game my god.

Put in Streveler. Collaros can’t throw. 

Collaros looks awful so far.

Zachs processing may or may notnbe slower but he was slower getting the ball away and took some hits he didn't have to. 
Guy was looking a bit gun shy with the OL taking  step back last season.

What's the point in getting personal about it? You can't prove my observations are invalid. This is a fan forum and I have an opinion about who gets the ball off quicker, Collaros or Brown. It is a valid opinion based on what my eyes are telling me. And you are welcome to disagree. If you did disagree I would respect your opinion rather than resort to an ad hominem argument. I guess we could run a stopwatch off game tape and test my observation. No, I have not played QB or coached at the pro level. I would describe myself as just a fan. Although I have lined up as a player in the CFL. In the backfield. And I know how to run a route. And that's all I'm gonna say. Since you asked.

Conjecture. For sure both Collaros and Brown have benefitted from Winnipeg's development of a solid Oline and a scheme that offered pretty dang good QB protection. But how Brown might fare elsewhere is irrelevant to the opinion that we should have kept him here. The size difference between the 2 QBs is also irrelevant. After all, Doug Flutie was 5'!0 180lbs - bigger does not equate to more success or durability. For sure Zach is a warrior who, as you say, has had to sit out for extended periods due to serious injuries. The fact that he has suffered so many injuries - especially hits to the head - underscores my basic concern about him. After all, Collaros missed games in 2015 and 2016 with the torn ACL - not clear he ever recovered from that 100%. In 2018 he was sidelined for several games due to a head injury and he did not play for most of 2019 due to head injury. We have a valiant QB who is 35 and needs to avoid hits at all costs as they could be career ending. To me, it appears that is taking him longer to process things out there post-snap. Brown definitely got the ball away quicker than Zach and was more accurate and threw with velocity. That's how it appeared. Plus Brown knew Buck's offence. That's why I'd have kept him. But we didn't. Glad we've got Strevy though. 

And when you have a son whose reputation and career options are torpedoed from a false allegation perhaps you'll understand why rushing to judgement can be ill advised. In that case, even when proven false, the damage is irreparable.

And when you have a son whose reputation and career options are torpedoed from a false allegation perhaps you'll understand why rushing to judgement can be ill advised. In that case, even when proven false, the damage is irreparable.

And when you have a son whose reputation and career options are torpedoed from a false allegation perhaps you'll understand why rushing to judgement can be ill advised. In that case, even when proven false, the damage is irreparable.

Excuse me, serious question: what victim? And who said that they ought to be shamed? This is a wrongful termination suit with a side of a sensationalized accusation to whip the press (and apparently internet forums) into a frenzy before evidence and judgement. And why would the accused be named and subjected to trial by press except for the purpose of shaming them into accepting a settlement (much as was done once before against the Argos)? 
This serves the accuser's legal strategy just fine, as was always the intent.
Give me a bit of credit for being a decent human please.
And your comment about the side of truth is just so offside here. And support what victim?
And this is why trial by media for a wrongful termination suit is ideal for the accuser.
Yahtzee.

Complainants are not entitled to a presumption of truth. 
The system is actually in place to allow for presumption of innocence and places a burden of proof on the accuser. I agree that naming the alleged victim can lead to pre-judgment and shaming, but naming a potential accused does the same thing (as some of the comments here have already demonstrated).