Wanna-B-Fanboy

I'll reserve judgement until I see the huck-a-sands exchange. Call me cynical, but I still think that is excatly what she said- that trump consulted Putin about Mcgahn.

Well, that was very responsible of the FAKE NEWS media. Now let's see if trump can issue a correction for his factually incorrect statements since he took office- all 10,000+ of them.

Holy shitballs! I saw that headline on CNN and gave the article a cursory glance and dismissed it as CNN being sentionalistic... being that sure of course if Putin and his lackey were on the phone, that the Mueller report would come up and such- makes sense and sure it's probably not as innocent as huckasands makes it out to be, but nothing crazy alarming... Totally missed the part where the POTUS, was asking the leader of a hostile foreign power to weigh in on his criminality and whether or not to let his POTUS lawyer testify.... WTF?

Good Lord, I loath cocaine mitch. He has done more damage to the democracy of the USA than trump has. He is vile.

So... no links or evidence or anything to support what you are putting out there... ? I apologise, but I need more than your single post to go on. I need something to support your view to take it into consideration.

cool thread on gerrymandering in Ohio:

Interesting take on things- do you have any links, if so, could you please share them- I am curious as to why the MSM didn't pick up on this.

SO... how did they know there was no crime unless they investigated it... I don't follow your logic here. Just need a bit of clarification- thanks!

Yet ignore all the facts and evidence of corruption, obstruction and Counter Intelligence cases? Oh- Barr discredited himself there is no need for anyone to try to discredit him- he's done that for himself.

If you are talking about Papadopoulos The difference being... FBI don't usually work outside of the country (the Federal part in FBI is a give away) and it is usually the CIA that does the intelligence collection abroad. So Comey (the head of the FBI) wouldn't know about these "spying" (it is more accurate to say intelligence Collection) allegations, because the FBI doesn't do spying abroad. If it's about something else, you gotta be more specific- cuz I don't know what you are referencing. anyways here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation "Unlike the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which has no law enforcement authority and is focused on intelligence collection abroad, the FBI is primarily a domestic agency, maintaining 56 field offices in major cities throughout the United States, and more than 400 resident agencies in smaller cities and areas across ..."

How much are you willing to bet that... the Saudis are a tenant at a ludicrously inflated rate (for laundry money of course)...

Jesus... Right here in plain sight, so ******* brazen (it's almost a thing of beauty). https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/05/22/trump-told-lesley-stahl-he-bashes-press-to-discredit-negative-stories.html The most astonishing thing about trump, the brazeness... he cheats, lies, breaks the law in plain view and reveals his motivations- with millions witnessing and does it like a total boss/******* moron- repeatedly... with no reprecussions- no lasting damage... its is amazing.

I apologise if I have been harassing You, ideally didn't mean to.

Oh wow... actually not surprised: https://www.kvia.com/news/el-paso/trump-campaign-owes-city-of-el-paso-more-than-470-000-for-february-rally/1073664103 "EL PASO, Texas - The City of El Paso is still waiting on a nearly half-million-dollar-payment from President Trump's campaign for his February 11 MAGA rally at the El Paso County Coliseum." If only we had any clues, before he became president, that this was bound to happen... oh wait...: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/09/donald-trump-unpaid-bills-republican-president-laswuits/85297274/

I think it is your lack of criticism of trump and your defence of trump by bringing up HRC. A LOT. You may not intend on defending trump- but it certainly looks like you do. If you are in defense of trump, that's cool- just not my cup of tea.

Throwing darts at Hodge is best.

She's not wrong about drone murders- she's pretty spot on with that one. She is technically correct about the "caging of children" but it's misplaced. The difference being the issue of child separation. In Obama's case the children came to the border unaccompanied in huge numbers thus running out of room to shelter them and that sheltering is required by law: "In 2014, we saw an enormous spike compared to what usually happens every year, in the number of kids crossing alone into the United States," she said. "And we didn't have enough shelter facilities, because we had a huge increase, so kids ended up piling up in Border Patrol lock-ups, which are no places for children." What the Obama administration did, which is what the law requires, is to find shelter facilities for those kids, which were put together by the Department of Health and Human Services. So the goal was to get kids out of the Border Patrol, into proper care by HHS, and then HHS is supposed to release them to the least restrictive setting, and in more than 80% of the cases, that was their parents who were already in the United States." So the take away that both POTUS' caged kids is technically correct, so the issue that should be addressed is Family Separation as a cruel deterrent, "Though the photos are nearly identical to those from 2014, there is one key difference between them: the 2014 photos showed only children who arrived at the border unaccompanied. The 2018 photos also show families that have been separated from one another."

That mayor was crazy crooked. Also- did you find out the answer to you question about the caged children under Obama? It was in the article you linked.

Did you read the link you posted? The answer to your question is there.

Pfft- pure anecdotal hearsay- bunk science!

What? Yeah, you should provide some proof of that- cuz I would love to be able smear Obama with some evidence.

They have direct evidence of obstruction. 10 counts of it I believe.

Don't get worked up- it's the Barr summary in full effect.

Did you read the report? Even just the summary portions of the Mueller report? Not the barr 4 page spin job.... the report. WHy just the two choices? It was in the Mueller report (the 10 points of evidence of obstruction) and no- he did not agree with Barr- at all. he even wrote a letter to barr saying as much. here it is: and you can get a canadian view on it too: https://globalnews.ca/news/5226039/full-text-of-mueller-letter-to-barr-report-summaries/ Even Barr didn't know if Mueller agreed with him, he even says it in yesterday's hearing: "I don't know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion," Barr replied.

Rubbish? You need to check the facts. Here is an article that does a quick outline of how it holds up: https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective