Wanna-B-Fanboy

Nothing "incredibly disingenuous and naive" nor "nonsensical" about my statements. Off the top of my head, most recently- sheerer's erroneous comments about the stupid food guide. his comments about that are not ground in reality, facts or science. How about scrubbing of all global warming data from the Canadian websites during harper's reign of terror? Muzzling of scientist?

actually- I don't recall the Chretien- I wasn't really paying attention. As for Harper years- hated his polices, hated his abuse of power, hated his muzzling of scientists, hated his draconian racist hotline, hated his caving to the other parties for the fiscal stimulus plan- yeah there is no con- boogeyman, just the cons. As for Justin trudeau, not a huge fan, but I would take this liberal over that conservative.

Fair statement- I disagree with your statement though. It's telling that you would use two words coined by trump. I call bullshit on that statement. If you have links- I would be more than happy to read them. They must be credible sources though. Please no notricks.com shenanigans.

It's not. It really isn't. Are you completely forgetting the Harper years?

Dude. I conceded the point that Liberals cheat- you even quoted me saying exactly that... or do you not read what you quote and disagree with?

Fair enough. Liberals cheat- but it is not on the same level as the Cons. It's something I equate with the cons. Lying- that is the Liberal M.O. I offer up Harper's reign, Doug Ford and Kenny.

Science and facts- the bane of the conservative party.

My hope too. Though I think Harris is going to give her a run for her money. Think a bit of as deep dive into Harris' police's are in order.

My beer league Slo-pitch team, "Handsome Warren plus 9?". Where no one is named Warren?

Actually. That is healthier. But, **** that- Safeway has prime rib steaks on for $15.35/kg.

CSPAN is getting pretty intense. EC has a very good point here

Cons gotta cheat. It's their Modus operandi.

Damn, that is disappointing. I was all aboard the Matthews train

What? Lawler better than Matthews?

So you think he's innocent? If he wasn't POtuS he would be indited.

I was referring to the Senate actually. Regardless- it will be interesting when things finally boil over. I am expecting an epic flood of incriminating and damning evidence to surface. And if I am wrong and he is exonorated- I will totally eat crow.

No clue if anything is going to take him down. too many (mostly republican) cowards enabling his systematic destruction of decorum, decency and democracy.

I think our Defense is going to have a really good showing tonight... That second half vs the argos left a bad taste in their collective mouths.

GAME 5 | OTTAWA REDBLACKS (2-2) at WINNIPEG BLUE BOMBERS (4-0) THE 4-1-1 Kickoff: 7:30 p.m. Friday, IG Field TV: TSN, RDS, ESPN+ Radio: 680 CJOB Vegas line: The Bombers are favoured by 10 points. The forecast: Sunny with a high of 25. Home/Road: The Bombers are 2-0 at home this year after wins over Edmonton and Toronto. Winnipeg is a solid 18-8 at IG Field since August of 2016 – when Matt Nichols assumed the starting quarterback chores. Ottawa is 1-0 on the road this year, having knocked off Calgary in Week 1. Recent history: The Bombers are 4-0 to start a season for the first time since 2003 after wins over B.C., Edmonton, Ottawa and Toronto. Ottawa, meanwhile, has dropped two straight after opening the season 2-0, with losses to the Bombers – 29-14 in the capital back on July 5th – and Montreal last weekend. Series: The Bombers are 46-31-1 all time vs. the Ottawa Rough Riders/Renegades/REDBLACKS. With thanks to Ed Tait https://www.bluebombers.com/2019/07/18/game-preview-ott-vs-wpg-3/

Huh. Maybe the coaches close the play book in a blow out and go vanilla so they save the wrinkles for a time when they need it? That would be the smart thing to do actually

Thta greenwood hit to force the fumble... wasn't that contact to the head? is that legal? is that not a penalty or only on QBs?

Well.. yeah, this was 30 years ago:

Or... a yugefucking liar.