Wanna-B-Fanboy

argos by 5

Awesome news.

I thought his suspension would have been lifted the same time someone else's was.

After all this you still haven't contributed anything that is credible. I would love to have a discussion with you about this, but you are not offering up anything that is supported by facts. Keep on trying though, it's always entertaining to see your posts.

Yup. You go for the TD. Maybe that was the time not to do the same QB sneak up the middle.... hit a different gap.

No one thought it was the same picture.

Well yeah. That is his point. What is yours?

lol, only someone completely dense would think it's the same picture used in both, it's obviously not, but the conditions were the same in 1917 for those of you who aren't smart enough to figure that out.

First off- no need to start with the name calling. Secondly, that is faulty logic- you are saying that the conditions were the same in both photos to discount the "alarmist", someone points out the absence of snow from the recent pic that was found in the 1984 pic (underscoring the argument of climate crisis) and you just insult him. That is not a good way to foster a constructive discussion and it paints you as a (which you are not, it just makes you look like one).

Back what up? you linked to the an information page of Austria's national weather service.

I think @AKAChip is saying that the Bomber Offence is really good at scoring, despite having Nichols as an "anchor" to hold the offence back. That if you were to put in a better quarter back - they would score more and more consistently. He's not wrong, a better QB would. Who he considers as better than Nichols? No clue, you'd have to ask him.

It may have been a mistake to move to the west... if we were still in the east these past few years... it's a strong chance that the GC drought would have ended already.

Good catch- I wonder if there has been any explanation for that. Looking forward to a notrickszone spin on that. At a cursory glance- the website is not credible and the graph... I don't even know what t hat graph is suppose to show. I did notice the "charity tip jar" link at the bottom of that chart. Also, what "wild claim" are you demanding data for? C'mon man- that is a **** site that purposely misleads and cherry picks data and presents data in a dishonest and distorted manner. It's been discredited and debunked many times in this thread alone. How do you expect us to take your arguments and points seriously when you keep trotting out the same shitty support of your "facts". I would love it if you were right and that all this is "alarmist" stuff. I want to be able to have a good honest discussion with you about Climate Crisis, but we can't have that dialogue if you keep using dodgy sources and thoroughly discredited propaganda websites as support for your view point.

Hopefully the same- otherwise you need to see your doctor. 😁

to be fair... a bag of **** is more useful than the riders.

She really is, her authenticity really underscores that.

Where is @The Unknown Poster? I haven't seen him around.

Solid article about Warren with a Canadian twist. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5190801

A few members addressed this a few weeks ago. Notricks is a bad site to get informed about climate crisis.

notricks is nothing but tricks though. if these are your sources for information on climate crisis, then yeah I understand your skepticism- that is exactly what those sites are supposed to do and are funded to do. You've been had, man- sorry to say. I totally understand where you are coming from now.

No one insults you for having a differing opinion, so please stop with that.

That is no better- that is a known climate misinformation dispenser, heavily funded by oil and gas companies. In fact it is worse than notrick- because it is much better funded and much looser with their science "facts"

Why do you keep posting articles from that website. It has been thoroughly discredited. Try something less... shitty. Its a **** site.

You just reiterated what Week left posted. "In summary, the mid-Holocene, roughly 6,000 years ago, was generally warmer than today, but only in summer and only in the northern hemisphere. More over, we clearly know the cause of this natural warming, and know without doubt that this proven “astronomical” climate forcing mechanism cannot be responsible for the warming over the last 100 years."

Looks like Warren did well and Beto bombed. Good. I think Beto would have been a good replacement for Ted Cruz. I feel that he shouldn't be in the race for POTUS though... he has no concrete plans and seems to go on feelings. Good showing by Booker though. A Warren/Booker 2020 ticket would be pretty good and hit all the strategic boxes too.