Wanna-B-Fanboy

So you think he's innocent? If he wasn't POtuS he would be indited.

I was referring to the Senate actually. Regardless- it will be interesting when things finally boil over. I am expecting an epic flood of incriminating and damning evidence to surface. And if I am wrong and he is exonorated- I will totally eat crow.

No clue if anything is going to take him down. too many (mostly republican) cowards enabling his systematic destruction of decorum, decency and democracy.

I think our Defense is going to have a really good showing tonight... That second half vs the argos left a bad taste in their collective mouths.

GAME 5 | OTTAWA REDBLACKS (2-2) at WINNIPEG BLUE BOMBERS (4-0) THE 4-1-1 Kickoff: 7:30 p.m. Friday, IG Field TV: TSN, RDS, ESPN+ Radio: 680 CJOB Vegas line: The Bombers are favoured by 10 points. The forecast: Sunny with a high of 25. Home/Road: The Bombers are 2-0 at home this year after wins over Edmonton and Toronto. Winnipeg is a solid 18-8 at IG Field since August of 2016 – when Matt Nichols assumed the starting quarterback chores. Ottawa is 1-0 on the road this year, having knocked off Calgary in Week 1. Recent history: The Bombers are 4-0 to start a season for the first time since 2003 after wins over B.C., Edmonton, Ottawa and Toronto. Ottawa, meanwhile, has dropped two straight after opening the season 2-0, with losses to the Bombers – 29-14 in the capital back on July 5th – and Montreal last weekend. Series: The Bombers are 46-31-1 all time vs. the Ottawa Rough Riders/Renegades/REDBLACKS. With thanks to Ed Tait https://www.bluebombers.com/2019/07/18/game-preview-ott-vs-wpg-3/

Huh. Maybe the coaches close the play book in a blow out and go vanilla so they save the wrinkles for a time when they need it? That would be the smart thing to do actually

Thta greenwood hit to force the fumble... wasn't that contact to the head? is that legal? is that not a penalty or only on QBs?

Well.. yeah, this was 30 years ago:

Or... a yugefucking liar.

I'm ok with chez or chezzy- but if his name is linked to a vile sex act- I'm out.

I made a note of your post, thinking in the future I would quote you for truth... didn't take too long... https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/17/politics/donald-trump-race-america-democrats/index.html

Lucky Whitehead

Nope. But I respect your opinion

More on to renewables. Tar sands are a stranded asset and should be left in the ground.

That is scary. And sad. Waiting now for some poster to debunk that picture with another picture from earlier, inadvertently with more evidence of climate change.

Equating the two is silly- one, is an agenda driven second tier "media outlet" that is sticking a mic in your face trying to force a gotcha moment- the other, is an opportunity to rebuke a racist presidents racist comments on your own terms where you have time to thoughtfully gathered your thoughts and hold your own press conference and release a statement. Replying to the rebel media if you are on the left, is never a good thing- if you aren't carrying the conservative water, they are going to spin it. The rebel is not even a news organization- it's basically fox news, if fox news dropped it's news section. It's been described as "The Rebel Media is a Canadian far-right political and social commentary media website." not even news- so what kind of journalistic integrity are they beholden to? That is the equivalent if the young turks were chasing down cocaine mitch and demanding him to denounce whateveryouwantatthispoint and getting outraged if he didn't respond, because of course he isn't and he really ******* shouldn't. For the record, I think it is silly when any of these media outlets are walking beside republican lawmakers and sticking mics in their faces trying to get a gotcha moment too.

Refusing to condemn or refusing to acknowledge trump's lies? You got a link to the AOC thing- cuz all I get is louder with crowder and the rebel media... I would ******* ignore those media outlets too. So out of everything AOC has said or championed- that is your take away? That is 100% cherry picking and taking things without context. Shoot me some links and I will check them out- I am all for discussing it. Help give me context here please.

Rusal, Dropped $200 million into his riding. Oh Yeah, that is the company Oleg Deripaska is head of, who recently had sanctions lifted... guess which way cocaine Mitch voted onlifting Sanctions? https://www.newsweek.com/company-russian-oligarch-millions-aluminum-plant-mitch-mcconnell-1397061

Good grief... the channel has been changed. Last week there was talk about the trump and a pedophile. Now no one is talking about that. It's kind of surface brilliance... Looks genius at first glance then you think.. "Yeah I would prefer to be looked at as racist than a ******* peder-ass". The choice is not really a choice.

Why not? We read your blatherings and take what you think in consideration- why would you discount her thoughts?

Bombers are awesome and the riders suck! Can I get a ******* AMEN!?

Agreed. But to constantly point out "issues" of our team and rarely critique other teams and give them the benefit of the doubt constantly... well that is kinda stupid too.

I honestly think we would have lost that game against Edmonton with Strevs. That defence required a bit more seasoned experience to defeat.

That may be your belief, but it is far from reality. It's the constant stream of nitpicky reasons to hate on Nichols while ignoring the rest of his body of work this year. You can't discount him as a bad QB by cherry picking stats or perceived shortcomings in a vacuum - people need to take his whole bodybof qork this year into consideration and stop with the "Yeah, buts".