Jesse

1 - Zach Attack. A couple of balls that could have been intercepted, but we were aggressive and I loved it. 2 - Willie. I think a few people have mentioned that he wasn’t the pass rusher that he used to be but yesterday he was the best of both versions of himself. He got to the QB, he batted balls. Everything. 3 - Houston. Can’t check stats (god damnit, CFL), but at least an INT and fumble recovery. Hard to have a favourite DB in this group, but god he’s good. HH - Evan Holm. What a couple of sweet pass break ups.

I never made my prediction in the other thread, but could easily see: WPG, BC, EDM, SSK, CGY.

What a waste of a DI spot....

If Edmonton puts it together (I think they do), Calgary could be on the outside looking in.

Wait. Mine either. WTH?

I don't think so.

I'd also almost rather not play with a FB on the roster...If Miller's gone, could we not add another DB or DL?

I just noticed that. Why no D? Lol. Anyone notice who got the interception?

The link takes you to some message page, you still need to look at the menu at the top and make sure you’re on the game tracker page.

Sure, buts that’s ignoring the pages of commentary that preceded that comment on possible ways to utilize the new rules or possible roster combinations that offered increased flexibility.

Why the hell am I listening to an Ambrosie interview in the first game of the year while they all completely ignore a TD happening on the field?

Honestly, after Zach, you could put the remaining QBs in any order and I wouldn’t bat an eye.

Ok. But we still need to be able to engage in constructive criticism or we may as well shut the whole board down. No one is infallible and for all the positive things MOS brings, there are some negative side effects.

It almost as if media members don’t know how to evaluate OL play….

There has to be a way to make it simpler. For everyone’s sake.

It's Zach vs. Bo.

MOS will have his statue outside IGF one day. Doesn't mean he's perfect.

That would make complete sense - MOS wouldn't even reveal the holder on the coach's show. I assumed that the submitted depth chart had to be accurate. Otherwise what's the point?

It looks like Grant will be able to come in for Woli if we so choose. Kramdi the back-up DB (or Darby and Kram becomes SAM). No nationalized Canadian on D because we only start Jake? Might limit our options. Like we thought, no roster shenanigans like some other teams are doing. Just the expected depth chart.

Exactly. So do I believe he's going to fully maximize these new rules or is going to continue to manage the roster as he always has based on his own set of factors?

We gonna see a depth chart today? Man, I'm curious.

Some here need to accept our Holm and Savior into their hearts. Praise Evan.

This is kind of how I meant it. I remember O'Shea taking advantage of loop holes and trickery in his Toronto days and beginning years with us. We haven't seen a whole lot of it lately, but obviously he knows the rules forwards and backwards. IMO, for better or worse, MOS values special teams as equally as O and D. This leads to roster decisions that sees several back-up LBs instead of depth at :more important positions" that leaves our heads scratching. People have also screamed about his loyalty in the past, but I think that's more that he respects his players as a whole, rather than just potential production. His start/sit decisions considers the leadership qualities, film room preparedness, etc. that we just don't see. Now, believing all that as I do, do I think that MOS is going to seat a guy like Woli to get extra snaps of McCrae on the field? Ehhhhh....

If you call Bomber Nation the small group of die hards that cares to follow roster moves, then yes, I agree with you.

9 LBs and and 3 DEs rostered some games... DT asked about it on the coaches show for me. MOS laughed it off. Said they do rotate the DEs and have had plenty of bodies doing it over the years. Also commented that you don't want to take the Jeff's off the field more than you have to.