Tracker

The buffering is increasing and increasingly annoying.

A Sterling play there.

Might be PI on that play.

He better not have any daughters.

Pigrome starting to impress me.

(Mild disagreement)

For those who do not want to ger too drunk but enjoy urinating.

We should be looking at individual performances rather than overall. With all the swapping out of players, its gonna be a mess and if we win, its a small bonus.

The whole Bomber d-line is mia

Augustine started last year poorly but got better as the season wore on. But, yeah. looked slow and indecisive.

Bailey made a nice catch as well.

Wade can be given some slack as a newbie to the league and all the motion.

Elks seem to have deliberately crowded him last kick to try to rattle him so he would fumble.

You have something against people staring in stairwells?

Not unexpected with the changing front four but the lack of camera angles makes it difficult to assess plays. Is that specifically the running stats?

Sloppy tackling

Cornelius has a good arm- no doubt. But the running game is killing the Bombers, just like last year.

Still haven't quite gotten used to Bob Irving not calling the game.

Cannot find where to sign up. Help, please.

Prosecutors tell Trump they have a recording of him and a witness: report Prosecutors in Donald Trump’s Manhattan criminal trial have notified the ex-president’s attorneys they have a recording of him and a witness. The notification comes in the form of an automatic discovery form, CBS News reports, which “describes the nature of the charges against a defendant and a broad overview of the evidence that prosecutors will present at Trump’s preliminary hearing or at trial.” CBS reports prosecutors have handed the recording over to Trump’s legal team. It’s not known who the witness is, nor are any details known publicly about what the conversation entails, or even if it is just audio or if it includes video.

Might not even be made at 40 Creek.

Nice of them to not string him along.

The case against a DC police lieutenant accused of helping Proud Boys is growing increasingly 'terrifying' On Friday, May 19, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Lt. Shane Lamond had been indicted on four federal criminal charges: one for obstruction of justice, three for making false statements. DOJ prosecutors allege that Lamond shared police information with Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio and tipped him off about a case against him: the one in which he was arrested for his part in burning a Black Lives Matter sign that had been stolen from an African-American church in late 2020. Lamond's arrest follows Tarrio's conviction in a separate case. Tarrio, along with three other members of the Proud Boys, was found guilty of seditious conspiracy for his role in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol Building. In an article published on May 26, Politico's Michael Schaffer emphasizes that the allegations against Lamond are especially troubling in light of his position in the MPD. "The indicted officer is not some random beat cop," Schaffer notes. "A 24-year veteran of the department, Lamond led the Intelligence Branch of the department’s Homeland Security unit until last year, when he was suspended after coming under investigation. That investigation culminated in a May 19 obstruction of justice indictment for allegedly lying to investigators who were looking into the relationship with Tarrio…. According to prosecutors, Lamond and Tarrio communicated 500 times beginning in 2019, often via chummy exchanges." Michael Fanone, a former MPD officer who was violently attacked by Donald Trump supporters inside the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6, 2021, has been sounding the alarm about far-right extremists working for police departments. Fanone, now a CNN contributor, told Politico, "I think that most law enforcement agencies in this country are scrambling to maintain the officers they have and recruit new ones to replace the hundreds that they've lost. The last thing that they're worried about is coming up with a comprehensive screening process for domestic extremism.” Schaffer warns that "the idea of even a small number of domestic extremists" being on the MPD "ought to be terrifying." https://www.alternet.org/proud-boys-2660668562/

You have just reduced the posts here by some 80%.

Ohio bill protects 'conservatives' from democracy We should thank Jerry Cirino. It’s not every day that a Republican says the quiet part out loud – that when it comes to free speech, the point is not liberty for all, but liberty for some Republicans to say what they want, to force the rest of us to listen and, critically, to prevent the rest of us from talking back. The Ohio state senator spoke after the Ohio Senate passed legislation last week that, according to the Ohio Capital Journal, “focuses on what Republicans call ‘free speech,’ banning public universities in Ohio from having ‘bias’ in the classroom and limiting what ‘controversial topics’ can and can’t be taught.” The goal, reportedly, is creating “safe spaces” for “conservatives” on campus. Cirino, who sponsored the bill, said it frees people “from the pressure to agree with a single ideological perspective, which dominates our campuses today.” Cirino shouldn’t have said that. He should have said what a fellow Republican said. State Representative Josh Williams told local TV reporters that he believes that “conservatives feel discriminated against on campus.” He cited his experience at the University of Toledo’s law school. “If you had an opposing view, you would just call that individual a fascist, a Nazi, as a way of quashing their speech and making their comments and their positions irrelevant,” he said. We’re used to hearing about discrimination, but Cirino didn’t do that. Instead, Cirino said that Senate 83 would, if enacted into state law, liberate “conservatives” from “the pressure to agree” with – well, it doesn’t matter. What matters is that conservatives feel pressured. What matters is that this feeling, to these conservatives, constitutes an infringement on their rights and liberties. What matters is that these infringements demand action, even though such action will infringe someone's rights and liberties. Free speech for everyone isn’t the point. The point is ensuring that conservatives feel free.