Jump to content

BBlink

Members
  • Posts

    2,383
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by BBlink

  1. Did anyone else think David James might have been cut? He was beat quite a bit out there.
  2. That was a weird looking boot but he did get it through. He was here to push Renaud though and couldn't beat him out.
  3. Cameron is not one of the top 2 punters. No sense keeping him on the PR. Sucks to say.
  4. That said there are definitely some good things about Carter too. To be honest, I didn't notice Kito out there a lot. Saw him once with a step on his DB, but even if the ball gets there it is questionable if he catches it. Poblah has a lot to prove to me.
  5. Saw Etienne have separation on his DB a couple times on a deep fly. A good read and throw would have resulted in a TD.
  6. Sounds like Dickenson's philosophy is to have a full time returner. Must not want Washington to play SAM (or any other DB position) because of that. He will be backup in case someone goes down though.
  7. Sometimes I think that during training camp they'll give a guy an opportunity, but if he doesn't step up he'll be one of the next cuts. Just throwing that out there.
  8. That's some old school coaching. Everyone should be on the same page soon...
  9. Liked the look of the older version but LOVE this one. Good job guys.
  10. Section 207, Row 14, Seat 7/8/9. I'll be sitting in one of those. The other two are for my wife and brother.
  11. I think they were punting just as I was getting there. Took some time to go get my season tickets so I didn't see them. Maybe someone else can comment?
  12. Our first Bryant Turner joke on the new site. Well done, Ty. Isn't it nice to have a sense of humour again? Based on all your posts so far, I was starting to wonder if you're even a Bomber fan anymore..... Of course I'm still a Bomber fan! Haha. Okay, I'll try to lighten up around here Cory.
  13. Looking back on camp today, it was probably one of the best first days I've seen in a while from an execution standpoint. Wasn't Tim Burke quoted today saying that the offence looks better this year than it did at the end of the year? That says something.
  14. I don't have many observations on the day, but I did say that I would give you guys my take: -Buck Pierce to me looked the best out there. Hall was at times throwing behind his receiver but otherwise looked very good. Goltz didn't look out of place either -Noticed that Jade Etienne was seeing a lot of balls, at least during the drills where there was no coverage. He can get down the field in a hurry and catches the ball well. Often he was outrunning the throws, had to turn around and attack the ball in the air. -Chad Simpson is going to make some players in this league look silly this year. He has put on muscle and probably looks a step faster than last year. I would hate to have to try to tackle him. Chris Garrett showed some skills today, slashing through the defence. -Mark DeWit looks like a midget compared to the rest of our offensive line. We have some monsters out there. -Saw Bryant Turner murder a tackling dummy with a vicious forearm. Tackling dummy was arrested for getting in Bryant Turner's way. Overall just watched a lot of pitch and catch. Nobody really stood out positively or negatively too much. There is a lot of camp left and it will be interesting to see how this roster gets pared down.
  15. Well that certainly is eye-opening about the first three rounds of the draft. Are all of those guys really big NFL risks? Naturally, we are always going to be dealing with the fact that the NFL is "the league" everyone wants to play in, but how many of those guys are realistically NFL risks? I was really disappointed to see Robertson go down with an injury because I agree, he was one guy that I thought would be a safer pick. Really liked that pick.
  16. he's good but simpson is better. Yep. Simpson looks unstoppable. Garrett made some nice moves and is very quick, but he is no Simpson.
  17. Completely disagree with that. There is always a safer pick. Doesn't mean that they will be a starter for years, but they might be a useful teamer for a few. I think we need to balance out our picks between risky and safe a bit more.
  18. but at the same time it's a 4th round pick... those are the ones you swing for the fences on. Guy was a good receiver who dropped because of the injury risk... so you take him in a later round and if he doesn't make it or gets hurt, oh well 4th round pick, if he works out and stays healthy it's a big win cause you snagged a solid guy in the 4th round. Not like this is a guy they took with a first round pick or something. We've definitely been in the habit of taking good athletes that we either have to convert or hope will come back from an injury. I'm not completely knocking the approach because if it does work out...like you said...you will get that home run. Recently we released Matechuk a Green, two guys that are purely special teams players. Just wondering if we continue to do this and players continue to get hurt...if we'll have any guys left to fill the special teams slots. Mulumba - Risk of NFL Robertson - Risk that he is not big enough to play at the next level Fitzgerald - Not so much of a risk, but we took him earlier than he was projected DiCroce - Risk of re-injury Alli - Already injured. Risk that he may not ever be 100 percent healthy. Billy Whatshisname - Risk of drug use (not really, but we were the ones to "take a chance" on him) Our drafting strategy is very "swing for the fences". Maybe a safe pick or two is in order?
  19. I do not see this as a fluke and that it was impossible to see this happening again. It's the exact same injury. There was risk involved drafting him. They got bit on it.
  20. I'm not arguing with what they did. But I guarantee you there would be a doctor out there that would have said that there is a percent chance of reinjuring it. It's not about whether he is cleared to play or not. I'm just saying its not a fluke that this happened to him. I've had 2 knee surgeries. If you were to ask a doctor if I'd be cleared to play football again they would say "absolutely yes". But with me there is always the risk of hurting my knee again.
  21. Sorry. I should have been more clear. I don't think there are any conspiracies. That doesn't mean that people don't make mistakes, or something didn't go undetected. More than anything though, it's hard to believe that he hurt his foot completely unrelated to his past injuries.
  22. It definitely seems like the Bombers are getting a bit too comfortable taking chances on previously injured players. It has been a little frustrating to get excited about these draft picks, only to have them not even make it through training camp (or some not even get to training camp).
  23. Thanks for the updates guys. I'll definitely be there on Sunday and will reciprocate.
  24. Oh right. Might have been the first player they mentioned in the broadcast: Trevor Kennedy. They were saying that he is extremely fast, and he can also return.
×
×
  • Create New...