17to85

I read dumb things on this site a lot, but suggesting we move on from Wilson is about as dumb as it gets.

The fact that he even mentions it likely means they will try and keep collaros.

Talk about setting yourself up for failure. He doesn't get those qbs going that quote is a noose around his neck.

Yeah when you go into the playoffs and have to beat the 3 best records in the league on the road it isn't a fluke or luck. Not that the Riders record was truly indicative of their level, but still. Hardest possible path to a grey cup and the bombers aced it.

yeah there was talk recently that Allen wanted to get into coaching. Not sure how successful he would be, but who knows. I am excited to give Pierce a try. He's worked his way to the position.

Have I ever led you down the wrong path before?

Have I ever led you down the wrong path before?

In before jason kenney takes over. Then all things will be about jesus.

The matrix is more like a straight up action movie than nerd ****. Not sure we need a new one though, the 2nd and 3rd were kind of ****.

Neil Lumsden is that you?

Whoa...

There also aren't any qbs on the market this year worth what Reilly and BLM make.

Lapo problems.

Just so concerned with arbuckle. What if he isn't the same guy outside of the stamps system? I still remember everyone hyping up franklin as a surefire starter too. Best course is one vet and one young guy as our qbs imo.

Who has bounced around and not really found a home. No Noeller has it right based purely on the definition of the word Nichols is the most established.

It's not about the length of the passes. It's a situational thing. Knowing when to go and when not to.

It's why I am not sad to see lapo go.

Lapo happened. Played passive and hoped the D would win the game for them.

My reaction to the trailer was "hey look at southern alberta!" Not much to on in that trailer. I suspect this will be something marketed differently than what you are actually getting. Why cast paul Rudd in stranger ghost busting things? But some marketing schmuck probably figures that's a hook.

Ok so if you want to say the GC wasn't amazing I will listen to that argument (I personally thought it was fine overall) but how on earth do you call the WF great play calling? Really interested in hearing you justify that claim.

I wouldn't lump the west final in there with the good games. The play calling almost cost us that game. Thankfully the defense came ready to play. Grey cup was quite good as was the semi final.

so sorry for being optimistic...

I think Lapo wanted whitehead to be another Weston Dressler. Trouble is he's nowhere near as polished a receiver as Dressler was.

you notice how I lumped Harris in with the guys who make it work cause they are good enough to beat people when they know it's coming right? You notice I also said he feeds the ball to those guys a crap ton right? Andrew Harris being the focal point was always going to get big numbers. It's the other guys who get **** all for numbers.

I don't know how people haven't clued in about Lapo yet.. what the guy does is identify his "star" players and he feeds the the ball over and over and over again. Works great when you got Milt Stegalls and Charlie Roberts or Andrew Harris type players. You know, the guys who can make plays when everyone in the stadium knows it's coming to them, but it's also limiting because it makes for a pretty simple game plan by the opposing defense.