JuranBoldenRules

Only if you can pay some roster spots $0. Math doesn't math if you're paying replacements.

Honestly his takes on the games are way more accurate than Bauming's. Bauming sounds like what people complain Ed Tait is....all while say "just being objective."

Bauming is way too much of a "other teams can make plays too" style analyst. Uses that as an excuse for horrifically poor Bomber play.

Money not an issue there. If they sign a rookie they maybe save $20,000 in that spot. Stupid to let Lawler walk. If we want to complain about money...look at Mitchell. His money plus a rookie salary = Lawler. We have 2 starting receivers on rookie salaries anyways. No financial barrier to keeping Lawler.

Yeah most of our position groups are losing to their opposite position group in any game. Our OL loses to the other teams DL, our DL has lost the battle most games, coming on a bit past couple weeks. Our receivers and DB's lose their matchups basically every game but Edmonton or BC.

Well yeah they had time to get those points back...but why give them up for like maybe 10-15 yards of field position on a kickoff? It's not like a punt where the returner has way less time when he gets the ball. Vaval catches the ball and runs up the field he's got 20 yards clear...and that's if he doesn't beat anyone. So ball coming down at 8 yard line, should get out to 28-30. Give up 1, you get it at the 40. Poetic that they lose by 2 on the points they gave away for very little benefit. O'Shea is outsmarting himself.

Think the problem is opposite RE veterans. Lots of all-star, all-time players who have faded and ended their careers, haven't been replaced. Lots of bodies here, not a lot of players.

Not really. We lost a game in Toronto last year because of that too. He's always struggled with that wedge play. Great at running option stuff.

The points all add up at the end of the game. D held Calgary to 4 FG's in 2nd half. We end a drive inside Calgary 10 and hand them 2 free points so our returner doesn't catch it at the 5 and probably take it to the 25-30....we get it at the 40 +1 point for Calgary. The points all add up at the end of the game.

Underrated decision that cost the game...putting Strev back on short-yardage and just running wedge play. Cost us a likely TD drive.

Literally going to lose off those rouges.

**** man...no awareness of the ball there.

Can't play 20 yards off when they are 25 yards out of FG range.

****...1 point but no time off clock and ball at 40.

Be leading by 3 if we caught every kickoff.

This is ridiculous. Even if he makes it Calgary has too much time.

Clercius makes a block that's a 15+ yard gain. Oliveira looks like the Energizer bunny running out of juice.

Throw a block, break a tackle.

Stamps DB's basically playing 12-15 yards off. Anyone want to make a play?

Well if that's their attitude that's a much bigger problem in terms of who is in the building. A lot of these guys aren't going to get other shots if they show basically nothing. If they don't have pride in their own performance their careers won't be long. Like if we cut a Wheatfall, maybe someone picks him up if they have injuries. He's not starting anywhere else. UFL for $55,000 USD I guess.

What do you call though? Calgary is basically taking away the vertical passing game. So if we're not going to break tackles and/or block, we're not going to move the ball.

I don't think he's doing a great job but the effort level/ability of the players on the field in this offense right now is off the charts bad. Like any given snap there's 4-5 guys just not doing anything useful at all, blowing assignments, unwilling to block when it's clearly crucial to the whole play.

The **** is Kolankowski doing? Going to lead block?

Jesus **** is Wheatfall useless in blocking.

Head ref called it. Wanted it.