Can't really argue a personal preference.
But I will point out that:
- Grigsby is unlikely to be on the Bombers roster in any situation where injuries haven't occurred, so picking our weakest import RB to compare with Messam paints Messam in a favourable light only until you realize who he's being compared to, then it really paints him in an unfavourable light.
- Messam hasn't been a lock to convert 2nd and 6 since 2011. That's why he keeps getting cut.
- Kohlert was really the only NI receiver we all liked last year. "Watson is too injured". "Etienne is too...Etienne". Kohlert was the porridge we all agreed was just right. Not sure why you're picking on him.
Nonetheless, I don't hate your suggestion. It's not totally without merit. It is still a weaker choice than DI-ing our RB and using Kohlert. In my opinion. And apparently, the coach's opinion and management's opinion.
If we have him on our roster we have the option of changing our minds later. I guess there's that.
And by the way, big thanks for using specific examples.
You somehow managed to do THE IMPOSSIBLE!!!
This is the exact reason why specific examples don't make any sense. Person A says this would be better. You say no it wouldn't. Neither side can prove the other is wrong, so the argument continues. No one's changing anyone's mind at this point, so it's time to let it go.
The big picture is more important than the details. Messam > Volny = Upgrade. Messam Short Yardage = Upgrade Messam allows choice of DI = Upgrade. Upgrade of talent = Better chance of more wins. 1 Additional win might = playoff vs no playoff.