Mark H.

Partly. But I think his play-calling is predicated on minimizing turnovers. I think if he ran an Esks or Stamps scheme with the players we have, there would be more turnovers.

Agreed, except that you can't ignore the slow starts by the O and the lack of red zone production, which many raised during the streak.

This is the same team that had a 34 - 0 lead at the half and had Reilly looking lost out there... Listen to yourselves..,

Those are exactly the kind of plays that were going the Bombers' way during the winning streak.

This the same D that won 7 games in a row. They give up a ton of yards but they 'were' getting turnovers. It's time for the O to step up and be the reason why we win once in a while. It's like a good hockey team winning in spite of the goalie having an off-night

It's funny how long it was accepted that human life began in Africa and people spread from there - no other possibilities considered

Just like climate change and immunization

I predict we'll win by less than a TD. If they pressure / contain Reilly, turnovers will happen - this ain't the Stamps OL. Best make sure the D scheme isn't getting schooled for an entire half...

If they came that way, it was later when there was actual plant life. The Inuit, for example, were the last group to migrate, which is why they could survive in the North I don't think they should discount the idea that human life evolved on this continent. However, you can't ignore the similarities to Asian DNA

Speaking of history, the Beringia arrival has now been debunked: http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2016/08/12/death-bering-strait-theory-165452

Yes, it popped loose after he had taken a step

When they drop 9 into coverage the onus is on the secondary

For most games during the streak, we did have a good first quarter.

Crap like this from over-paid athletes is why the CFL is the only pro-league I still pay attention to.

Noeller and iso actually agree on something - what are you guys drinking this weekend?

Not if it takes them an entire half to adjust the coverage - he won't

I noticed that too - he was hardly ever forced to throw to his check down.

JBR - did the protection scheme look similar to what Trestman used to run with Calvillo?

NFL rule: any player may advance and/or recover the ball after a fumble http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/fumble

Adams touching the ball is what allowed the Calgary player to recover it.

It may be that - you never can tell with trash talk

I still remember your comments from yesterday. It's safe to say that Calgary did make some adjustments for Winnipeg. They came out mostly throwing in the first half - Messam was not a major factor. It was clear they had prepared for certain tendencies in the Bombers' secondary.

Simple but accurate assessment of all the teams.

Our two wins against the Riders are looking better every week.

The End.