Mark H.

No idea what gave us that impression...no idea at at all. 🥺

This cannot be overstated. Last year, I needed a place to have lunch on a class field trip. We checked Google maps for the closest park and found a tiny gem just a few blocks away. It was perfect for our purpose - that’s Winnipeg.

We - will run - the ball.

Same as another guy who wore red and black...

Too much time watching his protection, not enough time spent looking downfield.

Imagination is the dark room where all fears are realized.

Did not watch any of the game - this thread was more entertaining.

Brian Burnham

Dude - he could throw the ball further...

Except for Chungh, who’s better when healthy?

I was at Bishop’s first practice - hell of a practice QB.

Subway napkins included.

And the date base is still not fully appreciated.

Based on what we saw Saturday night, he will throw for 300+ when teams stack the box.

Either way, you gotta say the QBs underthrow was the primary cause.

Crazy stat: Bombers won Time of Possession by 10 minutes.

If a receiver tips the ball, different story and probably not on the QB. But that ball was tipped by a DB.

First, I agree with a lot of what you’re saying, it’s a solid post. However, Reilly is known for throwing deep, thus the game plan would be designed that way. The OC will call more deep plays because that’s what his QB prefers. There no point in suggesting otherwise, it’s what Reilly led offences have always done. I would say both secondaries had coverage busts, with the Bombers giving up several explosion plays. You mentioned the running game - I think that was the difference - 150 yards compared to almost zero.

1. Harris and the Whole Hogs 2. Nevis and the Roasted Reilly 3. Hotdog Hecht and his pickles HH: Captain Nichols - who is ribeye and lobster this year

He doesn’t always drink gin - but when he does - it’s BOMBay

Secondary Tackling Issues - the Sequel

Agreed - good play by Adams to prevent the pick.

Precisely.

Greg Ellingson

Somebody go start a Daily Bonnet thread.