Mike

Drew both Fantuz and Tasker depending on the alignment.

Agreed in principle, I would imagine. I think you're right.

Maybe someone fell asleep on his shoulder on the plane.

Ya

That was my point, I was mostly directing it at those who think Willy can give Toronto some kind of advantage.

people aren't forgetting that Heath can share intel too, are they?

I wouldn't say changing your mind always means a mistake.

No contract in the CFL is ever a major mistake.

Macho is good to go. That should tell you everything.

Man he really loves the juice

Am I the only one who noticed Couture wearing 70 last game? It was a jersey with his name on it too. He has one of each. That must get annoying.

Steward is going to make a big difference. I have BC taking this one handily but man it would be nice (sorry LG) if Montreal could do us a favor.

I swear you're just being difficult. You don't think Toronto should want Willy because who's to say he'll outplay Toronto's backups but we should keep him because he's a valuable player to have? Make up your mind.

You're right. I don't want to trade Drew Willy all that badly.

If Toronto wants him, I want a Canadian offensive piece, a draft pick and a QB off their neg list. Easily.

That's a scary injury. Gotta think they'll be wanting Drew even more now, although I still can't see us trading him for anything short of a massive overpay.

This sends the right message to the team. The best players play.

It's always these undercover guys that come on the PR and get released without much fanfare because they've quietly signed a NFL deal.

It's a great program and I'm proud of Winnipeg for being at the top of the list, but any donation counts and the food Saskatchewan donated is still a substantial amount. Good on all of us! And no, I'm not getting off this fence!

Glencoe, Minnesota? I thought he was a NI.

Evans?

No we're not doing that. Ridiculous premise.

Who was the Bombers' starting rover for the majority of the games in nineteen dickety four?

When you posted over a year ago in this thread, you posted some pretty damning evidence of Patsy (the ransom note, mostly) that gets ignored when you post your most recent theory. The marks that you say are from a stun gun pretty clearly aren't, according to what I've heard. Stun guns don't cause abrasions, they cause burns. A lot of what I've read chalks those marks up to being from the train tracks. I'm not going to try and say the theory doesn't have holes in it but here's the thing - no matter what theory you believe, they all have holes. Any side of the coin you want to be on, someone can point to evidence that can explain how you're wrong. The Burke theory just seems to be the most logical, in my opinion. And after reading the AMA with one of the lead investigators, he words his answers carefully, but it's pretty clear he thinks Burke did it too.

I won't admit that I've spent a ton of time researching it, but based on the limited research I've done, it seems pretty obvious to me that Burke Ramsey killed his sister and the parents covered it up.