Wanna-B-Fanboy

dafuq is wrong with you guys?

You obnoxiously demand answers to you questions (which are provided), yet you refuse to answer questions asked of you. Not the way to have a civil discourse. You cling to %1 of data that taken out of context "supports" your "argument" and Ignore the 99% of the data that is inconvenient to your "argument" and then insult people who don't accept your flat-earth rationale.... ridiculous. Until you come to the table with a basic understanding of science, your arguments should be treated as those of a flat-earther.

I think that is a great idea.

Where in that paper does it draw this conclusion? I may have missed it, could you point it out to me please.

What empirical evidence?

I checked out the links- I would suggest you do a thorough read through of the links you provided as, you still don't seem to understand those principles based on you original hurricane comment.

What really boogles the mind is that Mark Judge refuses to testify and the republicans are like... ok- we don't need your testimony under oath- we have a letter from you..." Where is the subpoena?

I asked you for a definition- you haven't given one. Science denier? no, not at all. I agree with the scientific method....

What is the definition of fact and that of theory?

So then, what is the difference? Please explain, cuz I don't think you understand how science works.

I don't think you know how model projections work...

So.... what bullshit are you referring to? They show that an increase in hurricanes is due to better monitoring... huzzah! Is it correct? Peer reviewed? Why does this sole data point nullify the avalanche of data supporting anthropogenic climate change and make it bullshit? That is insane.

fitfy

**** just got real.

I think there are two whiny posters who do, and one who would be crazy rude in person.

Some people go through life constantly bitching and moan about the same thing, over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over... you get the point. So... did OSH beat you out for a movie part?

Rosenstein may go down in history as one of the saviours of the republic. That and Sessions' Russia faux pas.

That is crazy. Thanks for the info.

I know- I was just reiterating Pig's low expectations for a good HC. 😁

What are you talking about? HE HAD A GREAT SECOND HALF AGAINST THE ALS DEFENSE!

To who? Cuz I don't think you'd get such a tight locker room, respect or loyalty being such an *******. Which brings me back to... fiancee?

So... dog then?

Yes. Yes, that is iexactly it- you brilliant bastard. Now that that's figured out, let's move on. 😀

DiD MOS stuff you in a locker when you were younger? Steal your fiancee? Run over your dog? Beat you out for a movie part? You got a crazy hate-on for MOS. It's ridiculous if none of the above happened...