Wanna-B-Fanboy

Shoot- looks like trudeau is not the only one lying and misrepresenting himself. Lets go Jagmeet!

No, I do not agree at all.. all should be forgiven? Not at all. It should be on a case by case basis and include the steps the offender did to make it better.

WHat coutesy of forgiveness? I didn't forgive trudeau for anything, why are you continuously saying this?

These people have been rehashed earlier in the thread- here you go:

I don't think the blackface is the breaking point for you not voting for trudeau- if that was the case, I would assume you would take umbrage with the racist ties that sheers senior staff has. Yeah I don't condone his blackface- I think his apology is insincere. Was it racist- sure it was, does trudeau make policies based on blackface? no. Does his senior staffers have ties to racist organizations or are inherently racist... not that I am aware off. It's not as simple as forgiveness. do I forgive HRC? nope- I dont condone much of what she is accused of. Forgive Robert Byrd? **** no! has he made enough contrition for his hate? I don't think so. I hold all the above accountable and as long as sheerer continues to court racists and have senior staff members (hand picked) who dictate policy... well I think that is more offensive than 20 year old brown face. yeah that black face well dried up too fast- I thought it would have been more damaging. I guess people think racist policy makers trump 20 year old brownface.

I think trump believes anything that is favourable to him.

Good on You! I respect your right to vote for whoever you feel will lead Canada best. It was all hashed out in earlier posts in this thread about sheers senior staff and their ties to racism. Please address the facts and stop shouting them down- that would better strengthen your argument. Yet, you bring it up nonstop like you have #trudeaublackfacetourettes

In a condescending and insulting way- sure, nothing personal.

I am- I fully go into that with open eyes- I am not a liberal supporter- I am a thouroughly anti-conservative voter. ABC. I am willing to strategically vote against the cons- even if it means propping up a leader who wore brown face 20 years ago, who constantly lies about important things and is not the brightest leader. That is how terrible the cons platform, open racist policies and track record are. I don't agree on the conservative party's vision of Canada- it's destructive, divisive and does nothing for a progressive society. Who ever in my riding has the best chance of winning, other than conservative- get my vote. ABC. There were examples with factual reasons earlier in the thread- if you really are interested is a few pages back- it was presented to you before and you balked at the facts and refused to acknowledge the facts. It's there even if you refuse to believe them.

True- but I don't know of any other party leader who will stand with and defend them- other than scheer. Nor do I see any other party leader elevating known racist in their party to senior staff.

But I am not,I was actually talking about scheerer, but you knew that- yet had to chime in with your faux assumptions. Not sure why that is necessary. I think a less partisian government is a good thing. I also find it insulting that you would characterize me as a gullible mush head. You can stop with the thinly veiled personal attacks- it's insulting and does nothing to further the discourse.

Oh my...

Yeah- that guy just reeks.

I like him even more now.

I Don't think very much to be honest. I mean after we dip him in gold and put him up as a statue on the Blue Bomber altar, i don't think he has much leverage nor the ability to talk...

If you honestly are looking for an answer to these questions, Google would be your best bet.

I guess the silver lining here is that we still control our destiny- we win out, we host western finals.

yeah- that was a pretty dominant win last night- congrats.

That is awesome to see. Thanks for sharing!

First off- We need to upgrade both our coordinators. Right now, all I see is every tom, **** and jane along with their dog are bitching, calling bloody murder, pulling out the torches and pitchforks while the others heat up the tar and collect the feathers, while other posters are starting up the bus and others grabbing the megaphone and shrilly calling for Hall and Lapos heads. What I don't see from the frothing masses (except for @rebusrankin- the dinwiddie suggestion is interesting)? Suggestions. Constructive criticism. People offering up candidates to replace H&L. That's what I would like to see: some suggestions, actual viable candidates would be best.

Cool- thanks for the info. A little off topic- maybe you should start a thread on that- I am sure there are many posters who would like to chime in as well as become more informed.

If you honestly are looking for an answer to these questions, Google would be your best bet.

Thanks. No worries. I was just wondering. I wish I could do more- but it's tough raising a family, that takes up a **** load of my time. I honestly think that the best way to tackle climate change and the other host of issues (Micro-plastics, POPs {huge issue}, marginalized people, and so on) is through government intervention with laws and initiatives.

Totally fair points. Who would you have replaced those two with then? Who was available then? I know you don't have the same resources at finding coordinators as the bombers do- but I am interested if you had anyone in mind.

I fly as little as possible. Flown maybe 2 return trips in the past decade. I have a low mileage vehicle. I would love to purchase a fully electric vehicle, but can't afford it- sobi write to my MLA and MP and councillor to push them towards rebates and tax incentives to make zero emmision vehicles more affordable. I try to source as much food locally as I can. We have reduced our family's intake of beef and pork. Why are you being so confrontational?