Wanna-B-Fanboy

Yes, so then they can call him a liar and argue it wasn’t under oath so it doesn’t count? So ******* transparent.

Best. answer. yet.

"Whataboutism, also known as whataboutery, is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument. It is particularly associated with Soviet and Russian propaganda" I am not saying you are a hypocrite- I am saying that trump's corruption angle is not consistent and thus more about the target than the cause.

Not really in this case... it's more "why Biden and not JCB if corruption was the issue" and less "it's fine because Obama did it too"

He is. I think it's out of respect for Nichols.

We are in agreement with that. I was pointing out the JCB connection as a counter argument to the while corruption thing.

Thank you? For proving my Point?

yet Joseph Cofer Black is on the board @ burisma with little to no experience or qualifications and he's not being investigated... oh right, because his dad isn't running against trump... JCB is also the business partner of Erik Prince... that might also be why he's untouched...

What in the actual **** is Alan dershewitz arguing here? Obstruction of "Congress" is not a crime? damn... And the fact he is arguing that Abuse of Power and Obstruction of justice is not an impeachable offense is crazy. Looks like someone is trying really hard to convince the AG to stop any serious investigation into the Epstein murder... lol

Biden is the new Hillary.

I don't think Pam Bondi is doing the GOP any favours...

Wait, what? how is anyone selling themselves out over a dickbag? How are we helping him sell books because we want him to testify? I don't think that's how book sales work... Just because he is a warmonger and a generally awful person, doesn't mean that his testimony lacks merit... evidence is evidence. No one is championing bolton by wanting to hear him testify under oath... That is quite the leap in logic.

Yet here you are, parroting his disinformation... I am not trying to pile on here @Zontar but you aren't really helping your side of the argument here. If you have some facts you want people to hear, just list it and offer some factual support for it.

But aid was withheld. It was eventually released when the investigations began...

An so it begins, the final "defense strategy": The "So-what defense"... god I am going to be ill.

Cool thing I read recently is that Justice Roberts might be able to issue a quick ruling on executive privilege and take another bullet out of the GOPs "argument".

Just because the information leak was used to to promote a book doesn't make it any less true... It smacks of opportunism, money over country, but it still doesn't make it any less true.

Maybe, but I like to give @Zontar a chance to provide some evidence. If it holds water, I am open to changing my mind.

Discredited by who? Hannity?

Spoilers!

So... who are we banning? Canadian citizens? Visitors? People going to or coming from? How would you enforce it? Has banning travel been effective in the past? (Hint: it was not).

How would a travel ban help? Is there any other country that has imposed a travel ban?

Nah- when asked for proof, the conversation gets ignored. Still awaiting the evidence of millions of illegals voting.

The specific charges against Clinton were lying under oath and obstruction of justice.

Nice to see this! https://www.wthr.com/article/seymour-teen-honored-raising-money-baby-box-saved-child https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/25/us/teenager-baby-box-newborn-baby-trnd/index.html Good to read about these things!