Seriously...

I am totally unable to comprehend this. Anyone have any idea why we are a perennially terrible team.

Your D is pretty awful and the reason you have been losing, Your O is like number 1 or 2 in the league, I'm honestly not sure Durant would make a difference for you guys this season.

 

Sask... Awful D, 1 or 2 0 in the league

 

WPG... Awful O, Pretty good D

 

You combine us and you probably got a pretty damn good team really.. Our D, Your O. 

Your D is pretty awful and the reason you have been losing, Your O is like number 1 or 2 in the league, I'm honestly not sure Durant would make a difference for you guys this season.

 

Sask... Awful D, 1 or 2 0 in the league

 

WPG... Awful O, Pretty good D

 

You combine us and you probably got a pretty damn good team really.. Our D, Your O. 

We could call the team the whiskey warriors.  Gainers stays and we definitely go with your cheerleaders. 

Your D is pretty awful and the reason you have been losing, Your O is like number 1 or 2 in the league, I'm honestly not sure Durant would make a difference for you guys this season.

 

Sask... Awful D, 1 or 2 0 in the league

 

WPG... Awful O, Pretty good D

 

You combine us and you probably got a pretty damn good team really.. Our D, Your O. 

Like him or not Durant is a winner. Sometimes it's not about stats it's just about making the right plays at the right times. His record speaks for itself with regards to Durant. They'd probably still be a losing team given the stats you cited, but I just don't think Durant is a guy that loses that many games for them. 

 

Your D is pretty awful and the reason you have been losing, Your O is like number 1 or 2 in the league, I'm honestly not sure Durant would make a difference for you guys this season.

 

Sask... Awful D, 1 or 2 0 in the league

 

WPG... Awful O, Pretty good D

 

You combine us and you probably got a pretty damn good team really.. Our D, Your O. 

Like him or not Durant is a winner. Sometimes it's not about stats it's just about making the right plays at the right times. His record speaks for itself with regards to Durant. They'd probably still be a losing team given the stats you cited, but I just don't think Durant is a guy that loses that many games for them. 

 

exactly. bang on. certain players just find a way.  Ian Wild is one of those players, he just makes plays at the perfect time.

Durant or even Glenn could have turned Regina's season around. They'd have won at least some of those close games. I glad Glenn didn't come back a week earlier or we'd only have 3 wins this season. 

Durant or even Glenn could have turned Regina's season around. They'd have won at least some of those close games. I glad Glenn didn't come back a week earlier or we'd only have 3 wins this season. 

LOL, ya because in a clutch game when the chips are down, you just know that Glenn's gonna pick up the team, put it on his shoulders and then boldly march it down to the 20 or so.  Then throw a pick.  He's not called Mr. Dependable (by opposition DB's) for nothing you know.

Glenn 0-5 as a starter. He'd sure help Hamilton a lot more than he'd help Saskatchewan at this point. If I'm Austin, I'd trade for him. The Cats would have a great chance to win a GC with Glenn. No chance with those 2 rookie qbs that'll be playing now. 

So, let me get this straight, it's - 1st you hire the right guy, then everything else will follow? That "elusive right guy". The guy you just know would be right. That guy, who on his resume has, "right guy" stamped in the corner? Gee, that sounds simple enough.

Only 1 team wins the grey cup every year, only 1 team wins the superbowl every year... only 1 team wins the stanley cup every year... only 1 team wins the world series every year... so if i'm understanding this correctly... 8 CFL teams, 31 NFL teams, 29 NHL teams and a whole bunch of Major League Baseball teams are hiring the wrong guy  every year? Man, that 1 guy sure looks easy to fine...

 

Kent Austin is a good coach but the last 2 years he's 0-2 in the grey cup game, yeah they made it there but they lost... if the goal is to win the last game of the year then really, only 1 team in every sport hired the "right guy". 

 

 

Your D is pretty awful and the reason you have been losing, Your O is like number 1 or 2 in the league, I'm honestly not sure Durant would make a difference for you guys this season.

 

Sask... Awful D, 1 or 2 0 in the league

 

WPG... Awful O, Pretty good D

 

You combine us and you probably got a pretty damn good team really.. Our D, Your O. 

Like him or not Durant is a winner. Sometimes it's not about stats it's just about making the right plays at the right times. His record speaks for itself with regards to Durant. They'd probably still be a losing team given the stats you cited, but I just don't think Durant is a guy that loses that many games for them. 

 

exactly. bang on. certain players just find a way.  Ian Wild is one of those players, he just makes plays at the perfect time.

 

Noeller hates the comparison but I always sort of thought Durant was similar to Khari Jones. Not in style, just in the fact that they always seemed to find a way to win more games than they lost. Some qbs are just like that. 

*fart noise*..........poor Khari.

Danny McManus is another one to add. The guy made things happen. threw a ton of pick's, but the teams he was on seemed to win.

Tom Burgess......

Granted every team can't win, and it sucks to go to the dance and not win. But we should change the name to the Winnipeg Catfish.....sucks worse to be the bottom feeder.

So, let me get this straight, it's - 1st you hire the right guy, then everything else will follow? That "elusive right guy". The guy you just know would be right. That guy, who on his resume has, "right guy" stamped in the corner? Gee, that sounds simple enough.

There's no right guy in Hamilton right now.