heres 2 trailers. havent watched em yet so Ill watch em with you. 

 

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1502712?ref_=hm_hp_i_2

 

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0369610?ref_=hm_hp_i_1

 

F4 traIler: 

 

Jurrasic World trailer: 

2 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

You ask for miracles, Theo, I give you the F.B.I.

It's SW, it cam be total crap and make 1 billion. My money is on a force-ghost army ala LOTR3.

Supposedly they realize this trilogy is totally disjointed from the first six films and want to fix it.  

I wonder if they’d use Gui-Gon in some way.  To connect it they really need Obi Wan and Anakin to appear as well.  

Rian also butchered Jurassic World.... 

Then it's agreed, we shall all agree to forget The Last Jedi ever existed and purge it from memory and start fresh with a new 2nd entry into the new Star Wars trilogy. 

2 hours ago, 17to85 said:

Then it's agreed, we shall all agree to forget The Last Jedi ever existed and purge it from memory and start fresh with a new 2nd entry into the new Star Wars trilogy. 

Who wakes up and finds Luke in the shower...bacta tank?

Edited July 29, 20187 yr by FrostyWinnipeg

20 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

Who wakes up and finds Luke in the shower...bacta tank?

Now you're thinking.

On 2018-07-28 at 8:05 PM, Brandon said:

Rian also butchered Jurassic World.... 

???

Colin Trevorrow was the one who made Jurassic World.

29 minutes ago, Logan007 said:

???

Colin Trevorrow was the one who made Jurassic World.

My bad... I thought he was attached to JW. 

3 hours ago, Logan007 said:

???

Colin Trevorrow was the one who made Jurassic World.

He's on a Rian rant, let him row.

2 hours ago, Brandon said:

My bad... I thought he was attached to JW. 

Trevorrow was supposed to do the third Star Wars movie but I think after they realized he was a hack they gave it back to Abrams. 

16 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Trevorrow was supposed to do the third Star Wars movie but I think after they realized he was a hack they gave it back to Abrams. 

Disney's thinking was JW made a billion let's give it to him but then his next movie bombed and they got nervous.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/entertainment/entertainmentmovies/terminator-sequel-first-look-proves-the-future-is-female/ar-BBLmz2T?ocid=mailsignout

11 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/entertainment/entertainmentmovies/terminator-sequel-first-look-proves-the-future-is-female/ar-BBLmz2T?ocid=mailsignout

Im not a fan of the image as a tease.  Im cool with pushing the female leads.  But I'd have done a cool poster of just Sarah Connor as Linda Hamilton looks suitably badass.

It's just a teaser... I'm sure the final marketing will be mostly Arnie and robots.

35 minutes ago, Brandon said:

It's just a teaser... I'm sure the final marketing will be mostly Arnie and robots.

In disguise?

This will be up there with the new Halloween in terms of quality.

Ben Affleck will direct a film starring Matt Damon about the McDonald's Monopoly fraud.  I had never hard of it.  The trial began the day before 9/11 which might be why so few knew of it.

Its a crazy story.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-an-ex-cop-rigged-mcdonalds-monopoly-game-and-stole-millions

1 hour ago, The Unknown Poster said:

Ben Affleck will direct a film starring Matt Damon about the McDonald's Monopoly fraud.  I had never hard of it.  The trial began the day before 9/11 which might be why so few knew of it.

Its a crazy story.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-an-ex-cop-rigged-mcdonalds-monopoly-game-and-stole-millions

9/11 was just a cover up.

Diehard: Year One.   They are working on this now.  Premise is a prequel/sequel with Bruce Willis portraying older John and a younger actor playing young John seen though flashbacks.  Apparently Holly will appear as well (in both eras).  Hopefully they can bring back the charm of the first one (and the second wasnt bad either).

 

2 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said:

Ben Affleck will direct a film starring Matt Damon about the McDonald's Monopoly fraud.  I had never hard of it.  The trial began the day before 9/11 which might be why so few knew of it.

Its a crazy story.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-an-ex-cop-rigged-mcdonalds-monopoly-game-and-stole-millions

I did hear about that briefly along the same time they brought monopoly back 14 years ago (I guess that can probably explain why it was replaced by a Who Wants to be a Millionaire promotion, only lasted a year)

56 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

Diehard: Year One.   They are working on this now.  Premise is a prequel/sequel with Bruce Willis portraying older John and a younger actor playing young John seen though flashbacks.  Apparently Holly will appear as well (in both eras).  Hopefully they can bring back the charm of the first one (and the second wasnt bad either).

I said it before and i'll say it again...Zac Efron as young John McClain.

On 2018-08-03 at 4:24 PM, FrostyWinnipeg said:

I said it before and i'll say it again...Zac Efron as young John McClain.

Uggh...

I like Efron.  He's great.  He does so much comedy but I could see him as an action star.  He certainly has the physique for it.  Remember when Bruce Willis was cast, coming off of Moonlighting, people were incensed.  They thought it was a joke.  So Efron, I could see.  He has charm.

The reason the later Die Hards sucked, besides poor writing, was that John McClain became a super hero action character rather then an average cop stuck in a crazy situation where the odds were against him.  The films lost their charm.

I don't see Efron in that role.  He has to much of the glazed over pretty boy look.    

The later Die Hards sucked because it was so over the top that it made it more of a joke... felt like I was watching a XXX or Fast and Furious movie instead of Die Hard.   Zero grit at all...

 

for a second there this sounded like it would be a cool slumber party until I saw the word individually

https://www.newsarama.com/41271-harry-potter-saga-returns-to-theaters-this-month.html

31 minutes ago, Brandon said:

I don't see Efron in that role.  He has to much of the glazed over pretty boy look.    

The later Die Hards sucked because it was so over the top that it made it more of a joke... felt like I was watching a XXX or Fast and Furious movie instead of Die Hard.   Zero grit at all...

 

I think they should have kept the gag of Die Hard and had John innocently caught up in a crazy situation.   Under Siege stole the idea for a warship...and a train.   But John on a cruise ship vacation with his wife and its hijacked?  Gold! (notwithstanding Speed 2).  Although Diehard 3 wasnt terrible.