HardCoreBlue

Marshall just said hold my beer.

I’m usually pretty good with celebrations but Montreal needs to be flagged on that for taking it to the endzone and celebrating after the ball goes out of bounds.

It’s definitely one of those ‘I hope they both lose.’

Thanks Debbie.

Wow. There's that culture in a nutshell.

Please please no.

Your point #3 is often times underestimated in how it influences how teams/individuals produce. Athleticism gets you so far.

Ironically because we play them today is my guess without checking the googles would be the double E back when they were dominant. I feel bad for the league but not for the Eskimos if that makes sense.

Mining bitcoin? As the most non IT guy you could ever meet, what the F does that mean? Nevermind, I'm sure I wouldn't understand your answer anyways. Thanks for your continued volunteer support on this site that provides me with joy and a bit of an escape from adulting.

Some here and elsewhere wrap it nebulously as 'we' (don't know who this 'we' are) are being very divisive by telling them they can't have opinions that run counter to 'ours (I've never really seen this happen here)', they are being bullied and forced in having to groupthink like 'us' and their opinions are wrong and feel victimized by how they are treated when all they are trying to do is keep others honest. This is an absolutely weird and confusing thing to say. We all have valid and invalid opinions every last one of us but if one is being a messenger of fact, of sound and reliable evidence, of knowledge and wisdom no matter what they personally think to discount half truths, unsubstantiated claims, lies, made up ****, falsehoods, embellishments etc etc,, that's the best one can do.

Yup. It's mind blowing to me that some believe they can hold any opinion they want, any opinion along the continuum of craziness and outright falsehoods, and no matter what, no matter where this opinion sits along this continuum, it must always be met with civility and respect and if its not, the responder who calls these opinions out because they are wrong and dangerous, they are the problem in their mind, they are echo chamber WOKE libtards, not the actually opinion that runs counter to all the evidence on that particular issue. These same people will then appropriately come in very very hot on opinions offered by others that run counter to things they won't tolerate and/or care deeply about based on factual evidence. Perplexing, fascinating, exhausting etc.

It's not about believing in or being against abortion, that's moot, hold whatever beliefs/opinions you want, it's about ensuring access to this specific healthcare service to women if they so choose. My support for women to choose is not shoving pro-abortion down one's throats. That's a weird thing to say. If one's hardened beliefs on this specific issue dictates/forces/controls what a woman can do with their uterus, that's an issue. Supporting women to have control over their own bodies, supporting the provision of evidence-informed resources for women to access if they so choose to assist them in what they need to figure out and support the provision of different options of what appropriate avenues they can take based on their own particular situations/dynamics, this is not an issue. This is being a responsible human being for other human beings. Oh and pointing this out is not bullying ffs.

We've come to the point that certain people from all walks of life are trying to to normalize wrapping half truths, lies, embellishments, completely made up stuff as issues and perspectives and expect this approach to be treated with civility and decorum. I say something absurd or unsubstantiated or provide a false equivalency or half true or make stuff up to support my position, I'm appropriately called on it usually with some level of respect, I come back hot with hostility to respond to being called on it, I'm countered again to substantiate my claims this time with less respect and a lot more sarcasm, I then play the victim card that I'm just providing another side and this is nuts you people are all bully's and won't listen to this side so I won't waste my time with you. Exhausting. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequences from that speech. No one is limiting what you can or can not say but everyone, no matter who you are and what you believe in, need to pay the consequences, good, bad or indifferent, of the words that come out of their mouth. I myself over my lifetime have appropriately experienced that the hard way in the words I have spoken and written.

You and I have way different definitions of what bullying is.

Being a long time nervous nelly hardcore Bomber fan that I am, I am soooo with you on this. DO NOT play to their level. I do not want to be the Elks first win of the season, especially living here in enemy territory.

AND he's obviously a dictator most corrupt person ever. I've never been so limited with my freedoms, rights and privilege's as a Canadian as I have since he took power and if you can't see that I don't have time to tell you why and stop ganging up on me echo chamber libtards.

The default out here is everyone's bad (neglecting the different impacts and levels of bad of course), what about them (usually never providing an equivalent example), etc etc. Rinse, repeat.

Game tape has caught up to him.

I’ve followed this league for some time now and the separation in talent from Collaros to all or at least most of the other current starting QB’s is pretty amazing.

Either kick the field goal or keep Crum in and let him go get it. Pilgrim lost that chance.

Great game. Riders suck.

Take a time count violation.

FG is the call. Short yardage has sucked for both teams.

Santos Knox has had him a game.

Actually a pretty entertaining game. Let’s end it with a Ward fg.