HardCoreBlue

On a Winnipeg Blue Bomber fan site comprised of some pretty hardcore lifelong unwavering Blue Bomber supporters who for the most part understand the game at varying levels and acknowledge when homerism is influencing their perspectives, you come in hot and fairly aggressively tell people to calm down there is nothing to complain about. Then predictably when you get push back from those aggressive comments you clutch your pearls and make comments that the world would be such a better place if we could all be a bit more objective like you and for us to know how you post with integrity. This approach frustrates me greatly and not just for sports it is the main reason imho that our political threads here have been locked down. Feel free to hit the rolly eye or confused emoticon. Go Bombers.

Maybe it was an element of beating the Bombers who were on a 8-0 heater and he was the winning qb regardless of the stat sheet.

There is so much football truth in everything starts in the trenches and works out from there.

Mine at home while watching the Bombers or Jets play is: Family members with their confused looks: Why are you angry? The Bombers (insert Jets as appropriate) are winning! My answer: Incoherent muttering involving my 'expert feedback' on how their play could be better followed up with 'until that bigger boned person sings I'm never happy nor comfortable!' I really need to give up sports.

Yourface is an Argo fan?! Gawwwwddddd. So there you have it, we've identified the total fan base of the Argos: Yourface and Bluto. I know I know, I'm here all week.

Translation: we’re never happy.

Eye roll emoticon incoming . . .

Writes the one who comes in hot with occasional mocking statements to drive home their counter point. How is this approach objective?

And this just in a nice kick directly to our blue and gold nuts to enjoy over the bye week, Kelly and McManis earn CFL top performers. Blech.

Excerpt from the Winnipeg Sun: “It’s [PK]} new to the guys here, because it is a little more aggressive,” Chynoweth said. Ahhhh music to my ears. I love love love aggressive PK's knowing the risks. If they score, they're going to earn it.

Considering we have THE best RB in the league, it would make good sense. And it sets up play action quite nicely. Sticking to football 101, not overthinking, not being cute will bode well for us, i.e., another GC appearance.

I think some here are chatting about the current standard of reffing across the league regardless of who wins or loses. Much different discussion than ‘reffing is why we lost’.

Also read they were dealing with some injuries that gave him this 3 game opportunity.

I think I agree with you overall. Did the Penguins just want to get a feel for where he is in his development in being NHL ready by dressing him for the first three games of the season?

His loss.

Watched the Flame Oiler game over the weekend and saw Justin Kirkland score his first NHL goal. The pure joy on his face when they scanned him on the bench afterwards was great to see especially in what that young man has endured to get to the big leagues

In related news about the Wild, Ryan Hartman continues to suck.

' . . . [b]ut not 1 player is going to change all of this". Translation: All good, me. All bad, not me. 🙂

And a loss to the Argos to boot! Gross.

If by good you mean suck then yes Sask is a good team. Happy Thanksgiving.

And he’s practically running a D with 11 men, ie JT bull rushing away three steps behind making the life of his Oline counterpart enjoyable.

Now thats a statement.

Being the ultimate team game that football is, how about the Oline and their coaches. They were dominated. You lose the line of scrimmage, you usually lose the game.

He is dialed in.

No trust in our Oline right now.