Tracker

Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch founded and led a student club called “Fascism Forever,” while attending a private prep school in suburban Washington in the 1980s. The yearbook of Georgetown Prep described the club as an anti-faculty student group that battled against the “liberal” views of the school administration, according to the UK Daily Mail. “In political circles, our tireless President Gorsuch’s ‘Fascism Forever Club’ happily jerked its knees against the increasingly ‘left-wing’ tendencies of the faculty,” said the yearbook. Gorsuch led the club all four years he attended the elite all-boys Jesuit school in Bethesda, Maryland. Gorsuch’s willingness to flaunt anti-democratic ideas in service of his conservative politics continued through his four years at Columbia University in New York City where he founded a chapter of the Federal Society, the conservative law network. His senior photo was accompanied by a “joke” from Henry Kissinger: “The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer

Sounds like it would be typical yard mantenance around your homes, except that different guys would be in drag.

If you cannot accept the rebuttal of your statement above, there is nothing I can do about that.

Only if he brings his own walker and linament.

And he was, often, too.

Ms. Warren is outspoken, apart from the establishment, has taken the Democratic party to task for its stupidity, well-spoken, intelligent and consistent. Whats not to like?

Mumtaz was one lawyer who promoted the concept that, in his words, any Sharia law would be watered-down and apply only to Muslims who chose to have internal disputes arbitrated according to Sharia law, and where there was a conflict between Sharia law and Canadian law, Canadian law would prevail. This false interpretation of Mumtaz' position has been repeatedly used by bigots to wrongly portray that there was a sizeable portion of Candian Muslims who were seeking to have Sharia law imposed on Canadians. Mumtaz was never in any position of authority, and besides, he has been dead for some 8 years now, so his influence is pretty limited at the moment.

No one with any credibility or authority. There are the nuts who want the laws in the US and Canada to be reflective of Biblical law to the exclusion of all other considerations, but these have a lot more influence than any Muslim. Steve Bannon, for example, Trump's appointment to the National Security Council has in the past called for a Christian Holy War on Islam.

I would like to address the violent behaviour of some who appeared at the anti-Trump gatherings. There are those among who will seize on any gathering to break things and hurt people but who have no committment to whatever cause is being promoted. These are criminals, plain and simple who usually get liquored up, don masks and use the anonymity of the crowd to commit crimes. It has also been credibly reported that those opposed to the gathering will send agitators into that crowd to foment violence and thus discredit the cause. Police has been known to do this as well.

You are gravely mistaken when you say there are those here who would like the imposition of Sharia law- this has been a fear-mongering rally cry for the bigots in Europe and America for several years and has absolutely no prospect of ever being enacted here. You do not need to have laws to restrict people- simple cultural or familial imprinting in childhood will do that and people will suspend their own happiness to submit to a set of bahaviours and/or dress code to belong and not be shunned. The doctors at Jonestown who gave the cyanide-laced Koolaid to their own children were not compelled by law- they chose to obey because they were raised to unquestioningly follow whatever the "authorities" told them to do. How do you differentiate between those who are compelled to follow certain dictates and thise who "choose" to obey out of fear of being ostracized by their families and cultural groups?

Smartass.

How much tread does he have left on his tires?

Suspected Quebec Mosque Shooter Loved Trump and Had 'Very Right-Wing and Ultra-Nationalist White Supremacist' Views, Classmates Say The suspected gunman who massacred Muslims praying in Canada is a far-right internet troll who likes Donald Trump, Marine Le Pen, and Israel. By Ben Norton / AlterNet January 30, 2017 1.3K62 Print 72 COMMENTS Photo Credit: Facebook The suspected shooter who carried out a massacre of Muslims praying at a mosque in Quebec, Canada is a strong supporter of far-right U.S. President Donald Trump and a right-wing extremist, according to his former classmates, acquaintances, and social media accounts. During evening prayers on Sunday, January 29, a gunman opened fire in the Quebec Islamic Cultural Center, killing six worshipers and injuring 19 more. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemned the shooting as a "terrorist attack on Muslims." The suspected assailant, 27-year-old Alexandre Bissonnette, is a white Canadian who has expressed far-right, anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, anti-feminist, and pro-Israel views. "He really liked Trump and had a permanent grudge against the left," explained Éric Debroise, who knew Bissonnette and contacted the police after the attack. (Quotes are original translations from French.) The suspected shooter's politics are "very right-wing and ultra-nationalist white supremacist," Debroise told the local newspaper Le Journal de Quebec. "He has right-wing, pro-Israel, anti-immigration political ideas," Jean-Michel Allard-Pru, another classmate, said of Bissonnette, who was a student at Laval University. Canadian newspaper The Globe and Mail reported that the suspected shooter "was known in the city's activist circles as a right-wing troll who frequently took anti-foreigner and anti-feminist positions and stood up for U.S. President Donald Trump." François Deschamps, who runs a refugee support page on Facebook, told the publication that Bissonnette was an abusive far-right internet troll "who made frequent extreme comments in social media denigrating refugees and feminism." Multiple people who knew Bissonnette linked him to the far-right, nationalist, racist "Identitarian" movement, which is on the rise in Europe and North America. Bissonnette's extreme right-wing views were similarly inspired by Marine Le Pen, the far-right politician who may become the next president of France. Like Trump, Le Pen campaigns on racist, anti-Muslim, white nationalist policies. On his personal Facebook page, Bissonnette liked the pages of both Trump and Le Pen. (Bissonnette's Facebook profile was taken down after the attack, but it is archived here.) A pro-refugee group in Quebec City wrote on Facebook that activists knew of the suspected shooter because of his extreme "Identitarian, pro-Le Pen, and anti-feminist positions." Bissonnette also liked the Facebook pages of the Israel Defense Forces and the pro-Israel group United with Israel. The Israeli government is extremely right-wing, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed staunch support for President Trump and his anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant policies. After the massacre at the Quebec Islamic Cultural Center, police initially detained two people — Bissonnette and Mohamed Khadir, who is Muslim. Khadir was widely reported to be another suspect, but he was quickly released and police made it clear that he was a witness, not an assailant. This, however, did not stop anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant groups from distorting the facts surrounding the events. President Trump's far-right administration and right-wing news sources jumped on the opportunity to misleadingly blame the attack on a Muslim. White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer tried to use the rumor to justify President Trump's racist ban on Muslim refugees and migrants. But in reality the opposite is true: the suspected shooter is a white Canadian who massacred Muslim migrants. The victims were largely from North Africa. As if often the case with terrorist attacks carried out by white right-wing extremists, media reports and government officials claimed the shooting was a "lone wolf" attack, and gave very sympathetic coverage to the suspected shooter, portraying him as "timid," "lonely," and "kind." Far-right terrorism is on the rise in North America. In the U.S., residents are significantly more likely to be killed by right-wing extremists than they are Islamist extremists.

Isn't that fuzzy logic?

I just cannot keep up with all this newfangled technological stuff. Damned kids.

The precedent is already set with the culturally-enforced garb of Hutterite (and some Mennonite) women as well as the Hassidic Judaism expectations of women's "modesty".

What probably doomed Hillary was the revelation that the party bosses conspired to undermine Bernie Sanders even though every poll showed him to be more popular than Ms. Clinton and way more popular than Trump. There is a staggering amount of cynicism in America about the real influence of ordinary voters and these same angry, disenfranchised voters elected the rabid Trump out frustration. The prevailing thinking was, "what the hell. burn it all down" but I do not think that many thought it all the way through. They played right into the hands of the fascists and fundamentalist "Christians". The only way that the Dems can bring back trust into their party would be to bring in a firebrand outspoken leader like Elizabeth Warren. Bernie Sanders is cut from the same cloth but is too old to have the energy to reshape the American political scene.

This business about the terrible treatment of women is so widespread through so many different cultures here in North America and Canada it is frightening. Apart from the previously mentioned, there are also the Old Order Mennonites, parts of the Mormonism followers, and even some of the Hutterite communities. What diminishes one, diminishes all. It seem every culture and relgious tradition has its share of lunatics.

There is a provision in the American constitution to remove a president who has become unfit to hold the office. It was intended to be invoked should a president become comatose or demented, but apparently Republican officials are discussing the option to apply it to Trump.

Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) was a prominent Protestant pastor who emerged as an outspoken public foe of Adolf Hitler and spent the last seven years of Nazi rule in concentration camps. Niemöller is perhaps best remembered for the quotation: First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. This product of diseased minds affects as all. No matter if the slurs and hatred are directed at Jews, Muslims, gays, or women, it affects us all, even at a distance. We are all in this together, like it or not.

You bet your bippy. I would bet he is looking eastward to The Big Smoke.

If Franklin has any say in where he goes, he would be a fool to choose the Riders over, say, the Bombers. No quarterback, no matter how skilled and experienced , is going to stay healthy let alone look good behind that O-line guided by that coaching staff. The Bombers found that out in the Buck Pierce era, and in that same era, we found out that any quarterback with potential with potential will have that potential snuffed out and replaced with PTSD. Franklin will need a decent O-line, receivers and coaching if he wants to become an elite pivot.

No doubt he could vie for Ms. Saskatchewan and likely win handily.

More likely the onset of apathy. But who cares if you have it?