Jump to content

BomberfanMKS

Members
  • Posts

    757
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BomberfanMKS

  1. The fumble wasn't really about Collaros being careless trying to make something happen while trying to avoid a sack - He was winding up to throw and didn't see the guy coming unblocked from his blind side (who got there just as he was pulling the ball back).
  2. The TD fumble blitz happened later in the game as well and was equally effective - Both times they sent an extra guy on Bryant's side that Oliviera took away, Hardrick gets pulled to the left because their entire DL pushed to the right and a delayed blitz by the LB on the right side comes free at Collaros. They ran the exact same blitz at least twice - the first time was the fumble TD and the second was basically equally effective in blowing Collaros up. It didn't look like a mistake from anyone on the OL or from Oliviera... more like a mistake by whomever was supposed to set up the protection/play. HH - BOLO I thought played really well - didn't look out of place at all.
  3. Parker's been getting picked on - I honestly think Rose getting blown past was a little bit of trying to do too much as well - instead of playing honest he was trying to "hit a homerun" spying the QB
  4. What is Sasks Oline doing... it's like they are confused by the 3 man rush
  5. Couldn't run the clock... it was caught and OOB Yeh this discussion of a squib.is the opposite... can't give them a short field for the FG
  6. He was getting the ball out quicker... I think only rushing 3 is really slowing him getting the ball out
  7. Looks like Antigha didn't get a second chance at contacting the kicker there
  8. Geez Walker's a vet taking that kind of penalty Rofl Marshall pulling an anti-Bishop
  9. Yeh Refs making up for bad calls earlier I guess (garbage RTP and marginal PI) EDM got lucky with an early whistle on the fumble
  10. Cornelius almost looks like he gets annoyed when he has to run
  11. Evans always seems to play MUCH better the game after being benched
  12. In Canada you basically do need to be behind the wheel for Care and Control. The law specifically says if you're in the seat normally occupied by the driver. Common law rulings have now found that simply being in the driver seat isn't sufficient to convict for care and control if you've got a good reason for being in the seat (the supreme court specifically ruled that someone found sleeping across the front seats of a vehicle, with the key in the ignition but the car turned off, was not convictable for " care and control"
  13. TBH - once Brown got the jitters out he threw a beauty TD pass
×
×
  • Create New...