GCn20

I really like Cooley coming on as well, wish it wasnt at the expense of Vanterpool because he was a run block machine last week. However, I think that Wallace can equal his performance if he plays well.

Yea....its pretty concerning. Hips can drag out a long time.

Who cares. That`s ancient history. Different team, different QB even. You can`t look at Masoli 3 years ago....you gotta look at him now and look at the team around him. The guy looks like he was eating at the donut buffet all offseason, and is cooked. I mean BLM used to light us up for 450 a game pretty regularly when he was in Calgary, should we fear him now... Yea....not to mention he was twice as good back then as he is now and playing in a better offence. The Prukop play call was a head scratcher for sure.

Buck has not shown an ability to get his offence going in GCs that is for sure.

Yes he was. His job as an interior DT is 90% disrupt the play, 10% get the QB if you can. He was pushing the pocket back every snap.

Exactly right. Arbuckle really didn't do all that much...didn't have to do so.

They did a couple tunes last time I saw them.

Thornley is one of the best guitar players out there. Absolute must watch concert. I might make the trip down south.

Our secondary having their usual game would have as well. Our defence last year was not built around the pass rush.

Jake was excellent last week vs BC. As for being a starter...that was due to injury. It's kind of what our defence did all year tho except our secondary play was superb. We rushed 3 for a good portion of the year last year and let QBs try throw against us. It was our bread and butter, GC we laid an egg.

Zach's deep shot ability is not what is was 2-3 years ago but is still near the top of the league QB wise. He is still very good on the deep ball. The problem is that ANY deep ball is a much lower % completion and we relied on it way too much the past two years under Buck. We can't be taking the amount of deep shots that we have been taking the past couple years and expect high efficiency.

I think we go Peterson with either Cooley or Logan if he is ready. The holes our OL was opening we are going to have success no matter who has the rock. It was very impressive seeing Vanterpool 15 yards down field laying secondary blocks.

Watched your show this morning. Excellent. Love the interviews too.

Wade sets the standard, no doubt about it. Walters and Osh make sure that standard is met. That's the Trinity in a nutshell. For sure Wade had tough conversations last year, for sure he let them fix it too. Wade has his opinions for sure and shares them but Walters and Osh do what they think is right. So far so good.

Yep 2-6 made every game meaningful

Why would we change? We beat the team favored to win the West pretty easily with our backup QB. I will say it again, the last 2-3 spots on our roster are not going to win or lose us games. I don't disagree with those calling them iffy decisions, what i disagree with is those suggesting these decisions over ride the excellent coaching our team has. BTW, brilliant job by Hogan yesterday. Really nice offence so far and with half time adjustments to boot. Gave Strev a pretty simple plan, one he could execute well...and then let his horses up front open holes. The Bombers answered the bell yesterday even whipping boys Kyrie and Fatboi really played well.

We'll see on BO but I like what we came out of camp with behind him. One of our deepest sets of RBs in years.

Jake Thomas in limited reps had a great game.

Still beating the drum. Our roster won against a very good team. I said before the game that if we won by 50 points we would still see complaints.

Players play better we win the last 3 Grey Cups. Who we rostered in those games, with the exception of 2023 GC, to some extent, was not the reason we lost those games. In each and everyone of our last 3 Grey Cups we are 3-4 bad plays and a QB injury away from winning all of them. I guess my point is that if anyone thinks that the decision to keep Fatboi on the roster makes much of a difference in the grand scheme than they are letting the players off the hook if we lose. In limited reps he does not hurt us at all. Last year he got thrown into the fray due to injuries to others and it is unfair to paint that as a coaching error. It's like saying MOS is stupid for starting Strev this week over Zac because Zac is better. The better players is not available. If Lawson is healthy last year we aren't even talking about JT right now.

I am glad none of you are our HC or GM. Who by the way have forgotten more about building a sustainable winning football club than any of us will ever know. We can opine until the cows come home but the proof is in the pudding. Laughable that some guys think they know more than Walters and OShea about building a roster. Just the epitome of fan huberus. Can they make a mistake? Sure. Have their mistakes cost us much....not that I can see and don't give me the BS it cost us the last 3 Grey Cups because that is opinion not fact. A very jaded opinion driven by an agenda I might add.

When I hear guys say "it's a business" in the sports world it is almost certainly about money. Do guys get cut for diminishing returns....yep....we axed a few this year alone. However, one would have to be without an iota of team building awareness to know that you don't axe every glue guy at one time. I know Booch hates the term, but it is as real as it can be. Talent alone does not dictate roster, and only a moron of a GM and HC would build there team based solely on on-field talent. Same as a businessman must balance the culture of his workplace, so too does a football team. A happy team is a motivated team. A motivated team is a winning team. I get that from arm's length a lot of us don't understand the optics of some of our roster keeps but that is almost certainly because we don't have a good enough view. When a guy like JT is kept on the roster, there is more at play than what we see on the field. A player can have a very positive impact on a team overall and we will not know about it because the only aspect we see is on the field. If you think that professional athletes are different and that doesn't matter you are dreaming in technicolor. We have no idea what JT's impact is on morale for that team and more importantly what his absence would do to it. In a year we moved on from Bighill and Alexander at skill positions because their diminishing returns are far more weighted to on field than leadership, it is perfectly understandable that we would keep a Jake Thomas on the roster whose diminishing returns on the field are far more easily offset.

Yea....and the yellow brick road is all sunshine and lollipops. Gimme a break. Not all team mates are and glue guys. Should they be? In a perfect world.....we do not and never have lived in a perfect world.

Who says that exactly....told ad nauseum by whom? Who are these major thought leaders? I agree that business is business but I have worked in the corporate world and as a private business owner and I can tell you that continuity/team building/business culture is very much preferred over turnover. Performance must be evaluated, but it can't be done in isolation and without weighing the impact the change will create to the workplace as a whole. Glue guys are glue guys, and that impact must be weighed when assessing their performance. I have fired guys in the past that I deeply regret firing because shortly after I came to realize that I had minimized the impact they brought to the overall employee satisfaction of my business. Did I replace them with someone who performed certain aspects of the job at a higher level....yup....did it hurt morale and cause grief for me and hurt others performance...yup.

Never quite understood the fascination with 40 times. On the football field rarely are you running a 40 in a straight line. Football speed is an entirely different metric and a lot of times it is not the guy with the best 40 that has it.