Captain Blue

Holding for sure, why not review whether a receiver was offside in his waggle too? Where does it end? Are we going to give coaches 20 challenge flags per game because there are a lot of calls get missed or are questionable in the course of a game. Hell why even have referees on the field? After every play let someone in Toronto watch a replay and call a penalty if there is one and review everything. Just say no to reviews. Go back to letting the onfield officials do it all and if they're wrong they're wrong. It will balance itself out over the course of a season. I'm agree with this train of thought. The slippery slope effect may present itself where eventually we take out the real time human element from the game. Some may call that traditional type thinking, not keeping up with the times of available technology. I call it boring where the game will have ultimately have no flow to it. I'd rather have the calls be right. Each team gets 2 challenges a game, the fear-mongering of too many reviews is overblown.

I love this idea.

And again, obviously both.

Yes!!!!

Are you pleading for the Bob Wylie thingy or just remembering the words at the end of your first date? Obviously both.

Pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease

Feel like he took an extreme viewpoint that wasn't necessary.

Chiu would be interesting. Definitely fit as an O'Shea hire. I'd be down with it.

A "no doubt starter" for Glenn? Screw that. Man I am going to be ticked if we pay that.

See, I don't think the problem many have (at least not me) is that he has to be either positive or negative about the team. As the lead columnist for the Freep, I do however expect him to be educated. Before the Unknown Poster gets all in a knot and shouts "But it's just his opinion!" I would like to point out that opinions can be both stupid and/or wrong. That's my problem with Lawless. If you are going to praise or criticize the Bombers or Jets, do it with both logic and evidence. There are plenty of reasonable arguments to be made off that.

What an utterly useless, stupid post. This has as much insight as a Lawless article. No wonder you like him.

Meh, Lawless has a point, but as usual in the rare instances he actually knows what he's talking about, still manages to throw enough crap in it that the effect diminishes.

Guy looks solid. Found another tall, American receiver.

What's the over/under on when fans start demanding Buck to come out of retirement and become our starting QB again? Week 1. Average fan still thinks he's really good.

Can we start a pool on how long it takes for someone to call into CJOB and say that O'Shea should be fired and replaced with Pierce? "Hi Bob, long time listener, first time caller...just wondering..." I am setting the over/under at Week 9.

I hate Lawless with a burning passion. He hides behind his "I'm a columnist" line for everything. I'm not really sure how much he actually knows anything about the Bombers, or if he just purposely trolls since that seems to be the way of print journalism nowadays.

I can report that Friesen doesn't have a clue about anything. Sources say.

Good for him. Interesting to see if it leads to something bigger later.

Eh, not sure I want him. He'd be a really good backup, but I'm concerned they'll want to start him, either right away or if/when Willy struggles. And then we start the QB carousel all over again...

And yet you are basing your opinion on media interviews. We are all basing our opinions off what we see. I place more emphasis on what I saw on the field.

Just out of curiosity ... why? Doesn't strike me as cerebral enough to coach. How cerebral must one be for a QC role? How would you like me to answer that? I have seen Buck read defenses - coverages, protection schemes, blitzes. Perhaps he will make a great coach one day, since play on the field isn't the complete indicator of coaching success, but I wouldn't be the one to take that gamble.

Just out of curiosity ... why? Doesn't strike me as cerebral enough to coach.

I'm fan with him being an ambassador. Tremendous guy, who is pretty much well-liked by anyone who's met him. Coach? No thanks.

I hope the meme of getting all "name" players to coach here dies. I don't want Pierce back at all. Outstanding person, but really we need to focus on football and not employing former Bombers.

Considering the price tag of the trade and how a lot of people feel about him (including Danny Mac) I think there is a really good shot that Brohm gets groomed ASAP for the backup spot to Willy. He was a big time player in college. Like most guys coming to the CFL they will come with the "weak arm" label attached to them, but he was pretty accurate. Willy, Brohm and Hall is a decent stable of QBs. Pretty much all unproven still but at least they come with potential. We knew what we had before wasn't good enough.