Bigblue204

With Mccrae having a hard time with punts....I think they might. I guess it depends on Grant's status

A play that stood out to me in a bad way, but also explained a lot....was Darby touching a punted ball as it goes out of bounds....completely unacceptable play by a vet. I'm guessing he's a had a few of those types of play on D as well and that's why Kramdi started....I don't know for sure...but that was a...."oh that's why you're watching now" kind of moment.

I have not. Ive never written, "I hope they lose/deserve to lose" etc etc. As if this team isn't still the a dominant machine. Like others have said, I think the roster management can use some improvement. I'm not sure anyone has denied that anywhere. But...its absurd to think that we have all the info, and that MOS/Hall/Walters etc etc just aren't doing what's best for the team....instead of, oh I don't know...we just don't know what's going on behind the scenes. I'm all for discussing it. But when it comes to the doom and gloom and hoping for losses/deserve to lose type of "discussing". I'm going to become the smart ass I am. I mean they're 6-2... And I 100% disagree that we've lost even a single game from the roster management. I've never said it doesn't matter who they put out there. I've only said the coaching staff likely knows best, and while I might not like it. I trust them to make the best decision.

Heard he had a rough day out there...

"This just in, Football team had luck on their side in big Win." More at 6 O'clock. Keep those hot takes coming booch.

It's been a trend with him too...hopefully Grant isn't far off

"We deserve to lose" "I hope they lose" "Going to cost us games" "They got lucky" "Where just trying to discuss the roster management?"

I gotta eat some crow on Bennet, he played his best game.last night. Actually pushing OL back a bit. Getting some pressure, attacking the ball carrier. He made me notice him which was nice. You're not lucky enough

Yeah I'll keep slurping the wins as a fan.... you keep living a fantasy where you know better than MOS lol.

Well I can wait for next week when more Blue Bomber luck will show just how lucky they are to be 1st in the west. Honestly other teams are lucky at this point. If MOS listened to the coaches on this forum we'd be 8-0 with a 10000000 point differential. But really what game did you watch? Our O scored points but didn't stay on the field lol. Especially in the first half. OF COURSE WINNING HIDES THINGS. the sky is blue. What other amazing things can you share with us? Maybe that winning sells a lot of tickets too?

Again....how did the roster management make Schoen drop a ball? Or Brady fumble? The game was there's and the star players who ate always rostered dropped it.

If there's anything the CFL needs, it's more unnecessarily complex rules!! Barely have any as it is.

You summed up this post perfectly.

Wilson at SAM would be a gift from Hall to opposing OCs. He's a great/maybe the best WIL in the game. Don't move him from there. I believe Wilson can cover....but if the idea to is to bring Sankey in and move Biggy to WIL....people are suggesting Sankey is better than one of those two....and he's not. Sankey can stay out of WPG. Overhyped, likely over priced and completely useless in our D.

Look at that...2nd and long ..obvious passing situation and Hammy brings 3 drops 9. Crum can't find anyone, takes to too long to leave and doesn't get a 1st down.

A - we wouldn't have been using a roookie QB. If there was no Collaros it was because we had a healthy Streveler who was not a rookie. I'm guessing you forgot about the changes to the D late in the season?

Feel free to keep making a fool of yourself. I'm enjoying it. Collaros IS the best qb in the league. He wasn't in those playoff games. Again....look at what actually happened. Not how you feel.

the guy is absolutely done and fleecing the ticats

no one has said it was bad qb play. It was an ok performance by Collaros, that was 100% over shadowed by outstanding Defence. The defence gives up 1 TD, Bombers O puts up 20 points and you're claiming the O was more influential in the win lol. Keep being you Tburg

Lol it goes both ways. If the defense doesn't play well they don't win either lol. So all things being equal. As in, the defense playing well and Collaros on the team. Which side of the ball was the most influential in the 3 games? You're talking about hypotheticals...if collaros wasn't here...if Streveler started....if if if. I'm talking facts, backed up by stats.

Only counts if he gets most of it in the 1st quarter

No one is arguing against NO Collaros = NO playoff wins. I'm saying, when it comes to the actual games that were played in the playoffs. The Defence was a larger factor in the victories than the Offense. The stats show that. Take Collaros' name out of it and look at the qb stats and tell me that's a fantastic game for a qb. Like others have said, he managed the game. He did not dominate it. The defense was a dominate factor in all 3 games. You literally said no collaros = no hope. Hope is a feeling.

They had to play the regina crowd either way...? No one is arguing a rookie QB would have won. Bunk is pretending you know who else Walters was targeting I'm not basing things on feelings, I'm basing it on stats and facts.

I'm not sure what the significance is of going to regina then cgy compared to what actually happened...? I'm not saying Collaros didn't play an important role. I'm saying, when it comes to the actual playoff games, the defense played a far more important role in winning those games than Collaros. Yes if there is no Collaros, chances are slim we win (Though I'd argue the only way this team didn't have a vet QB signed late was with a healthy Nichols...and in that instance, I think there's a chance the BB still win it.) but if the Defense gives up even 1 more TD in Regina, the game plays out differently. Remember earlier in OCT the bombers lost to SSK pretty bad. If THAT defense showed up in CGY we don't go to SSK. And if THAT defense shows up in the GC, Hamilton ends their drought, not us.

strev