Jump to content

Bigblue204

Members
  • Posts

    7,819
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Bigblue204

  1. Apparently there is at least one team that is going to do a complete revamp. My money is on MTL. They need it.
  2. I've believe it happened because of their exceptionable play the week before. Saying that, I've never seen it happen. And honestly hope I never see it again. One of my favorite things about live football, is hearing the crowd get amped up when the last (usually a star) player is introduced and the place goes wild. That just didn't happen when they did the ST. It was such a let down...which then was followed by a let down of a game.
  3. Dont expect it. If not the bomber fans the rider douchenozzles will make their voices heard.
  4. It's just part of the same old "I'm going to **** on the current bombers organization for the past 30 years" bs. Anyone who thinks this way is a) not seeing reality. And b) misrepresenting the success the bombers have had over that course, yes yes yes. I know. No GC which is the only thing that matters. But it hasnt been 30 years of 2-16 teams.
  5. oh interesting. I only heard they received a few offers, but weren't looking to move him.
  6. oh ok. I thought maybe you were using him as an example of a 1st that has been playing like one.
  7. Sorry I'm not sure of your point?
  8. You'd think. But in the CFL that just isn't the case. Mostly because the 1st overall often isn't the most talented. Just the most talented who isn't going south...which often means there is a few years of development a head at best. Though sometimes you get a good one and they play right away. But that's not the norm.
  9. Huh? BC isn't looking to move him. They were just offered a few scenarios via trade from other teams. Why would they cut him?
  10. That's a big blow to the O for hammy. Going to put more pressure on Banks.
  11. Depends on who ask around here. 5-6 seems to mean clean house and cancel the remainder of the games to some.
  12. Completely agree. If he can't turn it around during the banjo bowl. Time to make a change.
  13. Yeah I thought "it's on Twitter stupid" as I posted that.
  14. Anyone have a depth chart?
  15. 5-7 = coach fired?? Lol
  16. **** THE RIDERS
  17. Dont forget about Wr and Rb. "Streveler hands of the Streveler, who steps back and bombs one out to Streveler....only to have it intercepted by Streveler who takes it to the house. Extra point from Streveler is good!!"
  18. when your first 5 games are nothing but screen passes and runs, it's hard to give up sacks.
  19. Yes he could have. But catching/not catching Davis, is not the problem with that play.
  20. ?? He's already starting.
  21. Confirmed or your guess? I'm thinking dressler in for lankford.
  22. He did make an effort. He started running, realized he wasn't going to catch the guy and that was it. He had absolutely zero chance of catching him. Of all the stupid things he did that game, people are complaining about a play in which he had no chance of making a play (besides the throw).
  23. In last few weeks. Common sense hasnt been welcome here.
  24. I'm more inclined to agree with Davis, Nichols was just giving credit to cgy....however, just stop talk matt. The optics aren't great for sure. I'm 100% on board with Nichols starting LDC cause I don't like a rookie qb playing that game. But they need to mix up the offence. Bring Streveler on, 2 backs, get Washington out there. Do something. If Nichols has another performance like the last 2. I'd like to see Streveler in the banjo bowl. They have to split the next two at the very least.
×
×
  • Create New...