17to85

Considering the number of american OL brought in did we really expect we were going to go less than 3 americans on the OL? This all seems very much intentional in how they decided their ratio, regardless of what the roster might actually be best suited for.

I think he's solid for what he is and would be a great depth piece.... but as a starter I think he's a guy you strive to upgrade on, and I think we likely do have some better options on the team already.

I will say this though... going from Jake to Jake at DT is going to make a tremendous difference in the effectiveness of the defense as a whole. Let's just hope the old guys aren't cooked by the time playoffs roll around

Look it's not even necessarily the numbers at lb.... I honestly question if we're playing the best guys as starters.

Yeah don't worry, I think that's a dumb plan too

Do we really though? To me this is a continuation of the problems this defense has had. Neglecting depth on the DL and dressing more linebackers than we really need.

"Nuts to that I'll just call Thiadric Hansen" - Mike O'Shea... probably

If faj can kick around with his noodle arm for as long as he has so can Perkins. It's ot great but if you work with in it you can do something

Crave basically started out as the movie channels on cable packages. It was the place movies hit first after ppv. It was the way to get HBO. Which is why it had the premium price tag. Since everything needs to be streaming now bell turned it into its own streaming service.

How many other leagues only have 4 games a week max?

My take is that singer is the guy to go with as a rookie receiver. He's more versatile and more dangerous of the two guys who got a decent amount of targets. Whoever #15 was absolutely useless and makes me wonder how he even got an invite... Jenkins on the DL is a starter. No doubt in my mind. He was consistently good in both preseason games. Few other guys looked good but there were also periods where the dl didn't get any push and I couldn't tell who was out there when that was happening. Dbs hard to really say, major Wilson seems like he might be solid. Stuart is going to be good but I think he’s a development guy this year. Kelly hasn't seemed to progress and honestly he should be a potential cut given some of the new blood.

His hands are nowhere good enough to be as slow as he is.

The difference is that tsn was one stop for games and every cable package had tsn as an option for a nominal price if it wasn't already included. I mean the cash infusion is great but I ain't subscribing to another platform just for Saturday cfl games.

The problem is you're making the CFL less accessible to fans by putting games on an obscure platform... it's a risk and sure they get a big payout now but what if that doesn't last? My opinion the biggest thing the cfl needs is a grass roots effort to get support in all cities. Until they do that the league will always be on the brink of disaster.

You know what i would love to see? And option to buy just cfl games ans then I could watch cfl and only cfl on whatever streaming service had that particular game.

Game 1 gonna be roooouuuuggggghhhhh

The chatter seems to indicate that Wilson thought he was just going to be handed the spot... so that's probably why he bailed. Didn't want to compete and felt he was getting beaten.

Also, I doubt pubs and restaurants are going to have a subscription to show that in their venues as opposed to just throwing tsn on one of the tvs.

Because the greedy fucks who make decisions don't realize that people don't want 1000 subscription payments to watch everything. They want 1 or 2 places to get what they want. More than that piracy is more attractive.

I actually don't think Wilson was ever as much of an after thought as all that... I think the backup spot was wide open to whoever wanted to take it.

Yeah I'm not adding yet another subscription just for cfl. Guess it'll be cjob like back in the day and then wait for a pirated copy to hit the interwebs.

Yes but they weren't used to talk about usage, they were used in the context of performance. In my opinion it's simply a case where there needs more discussion surrounding all those stats.

Hilarious. Perhaps the depth chart was made in such a way as "well we've seen Terry Wilson for a bunch of preseason now, we haven't seen the new guy so he needs more reps to see what he's got. " But no disrespect for not just being handed the job... which he probably would have got anyway based on experience and familiarity.

Because I don't think you can throw out things like yards per target and yac, and catch % in a vacuum without giving at least some context to a players usage. Might not change the interpretation, but it needs to be addressed IMO.