JuranBoldenRules

Now we have Fletcher and Jefferson both waving their arms around, making no attempt to drive the pocket back to the QB.

Let's just focus on the basics. You're going to jump to gain 2 yards from your own 17 to your own 19.

Can't give him possession until he possesses it....and it's quite clearly not until he's on the turf well outside the goal-line.

**** I'd hold a parade in that case....if we stop giving them the free 8-12 yard routes on 1st and 10.

Younger couldn't call plays in the WHSFL.

The literally just motioned all our LB's to the other side of the field and ran Rankin between the corner and DE at no one. This scheme is rotten.

Fajardo has like a 70/100 arm. Why give him a free 8 yards every play? Make him fit the ball in between, sit under some routes.

They've gradually coached all aggression out of this defense in the past 3 seasons.

Put them back on the 1 just like how they move the ball right to the 1 going in now. Don't think he had that while in bounds.

New centre for Perkins.

He got blocked down to the turf and got back in the play to make that stop before the pilon too.

That's the first possession in 2 games where the Bombers D didn't give up a first down.

Massive hold on Smith.

Maybe that will inspire the D to realize they are allowed to attack the ball.

Wilson hurt too.

Wallace got away with a major hold.

I'm fine with him there. Edmonton was really picking on our LB's with playaction. Way too much space between levels.

This D has literally only got off the field in the last two games because Johnny Augustine walked out of bounds when he could have just turned up field for the first. If they don't break this streak and make some plays, time for major change. Just pathetic physical and mental engagement from them right now.

Might as well have held their hand and walked them down the field for 6.

Williams took the wrong leverage there and gave Leake the edge. Terrible play.

Just a pathetic level of compete from this defense right now. If this doesn't turn around tonight they need to send a few guys out.

Gotta run the ball. Got a green OL out there....run it.

Apparently you can just trip guys to tackle now.

I think the only stadiums that don't have U Sports teams as primary tenants....and aren't used often for amateur football....are Toronto, Hamilton, Ottawa, BC and Edmonton. But Hamilton, Ottawa and BC have significant amateur usage, Ottawa has hosted lots of U Sports games although both schools there have their own stadiums too. BC plays US rules for high school so it's already different when they use BC Place for provincials. Montreal is actually one of the stadiums that will be hardest to change because McGill isn't really willing to play ball....and it's their stadium. Als will have to foot the bill 100% to put a second goal post footing in and move the posts just for their games. The field lining will be an issue too because most of the turf fields are sewn in except for ads. That's millions of dollars to replace and a lot of money ongoing to play on a field that needs the lines changed repeatedly. Might end up playing on a field with multiple sets of lines for football which will look bush league. I've generally thought the field changes wouldn't happen largely because of the issue of cost and field usage where the CFL is a tenant in a lot of stadiums that are community owned really.

There's a 0% chance amateur football will change field dimensions. It costs millions of dollars for turf fields. Some of these have just been replaced and will live for 15-20 years. It costs tens and tens of thousands to move/replace uprights. This would only happen over decades as fields are replaced. There's also zero benefit to the field dimension changes. The football people around the table know this. Just turning a lot of FG's into punts.