Jump to content

johnzo

Members
  • Posts

    4,542
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by johnzo

  1. I know it's minor, but what was up with the snaps?I swear Nichols had to reach for 1/2 of them.

    Picard's snaps have been lottery tickets all year. Their wandering nature is somewhat mitigated by their slowness, it gives the QB time to locate and catch them.

    How minor a deal is it that the QB has to take half a second to receive the wandering snap? Timing is so critical in a lot of these plays, if the snap is a slow I bet it has repercussions later in the play.

  2. Doesn't running a 3-4 leave you vulnerable to the run game? You're gonna have more OLs getting to linebackers.

    We ran 3-4 during the glory days in the 80s, but Ty Jones was mainly a pass rush guy instead of a linebacker.

  3. If Simmons is as good as he was with Ottawa, the thought of a Simmons-Bass-Wild linebacking corps makes me positively giddy.

    Who of those 3 is covering a slotback?

    Bass or Wild. I don't know if Simmons has the speed.

    You seriously want one of those guys covering receivers like Green and Dressler?

    This team uses two linebackers, not three. Our D is a 4-2-6. Hell, it looks like a 5-1-6 on a lot of occasions because Hurl's usually jumping into a gap right after the snap.

  4. These are super interesting but they seem off. Want to see more about the methodology.

    Also, Calgary at 8th in yards per rush doesn't seem right -- my numbers have them at 5th after all week 9 games. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jP_cypt8ZfpOxDRSNNkYYBG_Cfl3IHJ-EWysW5X1r7c/edit#gid=0. Though the margin between 5 and 8 is super tight -- just 1/10 of a yard. Maybe Mark's numbers are for an earlier week.

    Good lord, Saskatchewan is great at running the ball this year.

  5. I think Garrett was the best back we've had since Roberts and we haven't seen his equal since, though Marshall is looking good. Garrett didn't quite have Reid's massive burst, but I remember him playing way stronger. That 6.7 yard average in 2011 wasn't a few 90-yard run and dozens of 2-yard runs. He was a reliable producer with the rock. When he blew out his Achilles in 2012 before the season even started, I was seriously bummed.

    Simpson, no thanks. All that juking and jiving and east-west running he did out there, trying to win the game by himself, made him look more like a rookie kick returner than a starting running back. Take away that big game he had against Toronto (the one where Adriano Belli put away his sailor suit and came out of retirement and was in way over his head) and he really wasn't that great for us.

  6. ?

    Life's too short...

    It's easy. See a football on the left, scroll down. Keep seeing footballs, keep scrolling. 5 or more posts in a row without a football, backtrack and see if there is something finally worth reading.

    It's like you're sitting there with the remote control in your hand but can't stop complaining about how bad the show is.

    This board has a great ignore list feature .. but when people feed the trolls, it becomes less useful, alas.

  7. Would a trio of Bass, Simmons and Wild as WIL, MAC and SAM respectively workable.

    I mean I get that the SAM is technically a DB spot but I would think Wild can be a cover guy, he is listed 6.00 208 (not sure if accurate) so I dont think he's too heavy for that position plus he got a good speed and played safety in college.

    That trio would be sick.
    Sure I'd love to see Ian Wild back here, but as a dimeback? C'mon, seriously. Who here would prefer to have Wild and not Randle regularly covering guys like Dressler or S.J. Green?

    Remember that -- outside of short yardage situations -- we are running a 4-2-6 defence. We have only two linebackers. So I doubt there's a way we'll see all three on the field at once.

×
×
  • Create New...