kelownabomberfan

Hmmm....where have I seen this movie before? I think it was 2008. So if the Riders want to continue on following Winnipeg into 2009...then I've got the perfect candidate for them to replace Chamblin and Taman with, and he's tanned, rested and ready...

Why release Tino now? Is Glenn coming back?

When your salary cap management system is written on Subway napkins, you know that perhaps you should be upgrading. To at least foolscap.

Trent Richardson cut by Oakland. Could be his last stop. Neg list him maybe?

Here's why the NDP just can't gain control of the public purse, or public policy. There are just too many loons like this guy in the NDP, who want Canada turned into Venezuela north... At 10:00 am this morning on News Talk 770 Calgary the Chair of the NDP socialist caucus Barry Weisleder openly stated that his party are advocating for the government to take over the oilsands. When pressed on how they would compensate for the capital outlay it would require to pay the rightful owners of the production leases he stated that they would assess fees for the "damage" they have done and that would offset the cost. In other words they would seize them. If you're interested go to the Newstalk 770 archive page at this link and listen to 10:00 am August 31 http://www.newstalk770.com/audio-on-demand-2/ This guy actually wants to seize the oil sands, and uses the flimsiest of excuses to justify the theft. These are companies that have invested billions of dollars, and he sees no issue with just destroying them, seizing their property, and laying off thousands of people. He can't see the massive damage this would do to the entire economy. He is reflective of so many other NDP zealots I have met over the years - so blinded by idiotic ideology that he just doesn't care about the damage he wants to wreak. The NDP is just plain awful.

Is Cam Marshall hurt? I don't get it.

Fine by me. But when you do one of your petty little Anti-Harper rants, and you put in lies about health care cuts, be prepared to be called on it.

can we trade Brohm and a pick to Sask for Smith before Sunday?

and here we have yet another example of the bias of the CBC... http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/document-raises-questions-about-harper-retirement-policies-1.3198157 Just a total smear/hack job by the nutty leftists at the CBC. Kind of like saying that Harper has cut $36 billion from Health budgets, when in fact health budgets have been raised. in response:

if he's actually healthy, bring him in.

It's official, Wild is cut. Pittsburgh Steelers G Miles Dieffenbach WR Kenzel Doe WR C.J. Goodwin RB Braylon Heard DE Joe Kruger DT Joe Okafor OL Colin Rahrig CB Jordan Sullen OT Kevin Whimpey S Ian Wild http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/8/30/9225131/2015-nfl-roster-cuts-tracker-75-man-deadline

I wish this guy would run...

I think if Trudeau just said the following, he'd have people coming to him enmasse: "Look the federal government needs $15 billion more per year in revenue. We had that when the GST was 7%. I can't say I will balance the budget (and whoever does promise you that is lying) but I will say that going back to 7% GST would be a huge win for everyone. Let's go back to where we were, and enough of this nonsense". Boom. Done.

Then apologize As if. I never posted any link to that group. Of course you won't apologize. The NDP never does. And this is why you guys lose election after election, your arrogance nails you every single time.

It's a change to the formula, not a "cut". It's semantic wordplay designed to sway the uninformed voter, which is standard NDP modus operandi.

Yup, I was hyping Marve, I admit it, and all I've seen so far is Justin Goltz 2.0. Argh.

well all right. That's actually given me something to think about. Thank you for that.

Then apologize for posting that Harper has cut $36 billion from health care spending in Canada, as it is a total lie, and you posted it. It's really simple. NOT TRUE!

Mike Hansen ‏@MikeHansen613 Aug 27 This is a serious #NDP candidate. I'm not joking. #meetthendp

This is the only part of your entire post that made much sense. You claim to know a lot about this area, and yet whenever you talk about it, you sound like a Marine biologist who doesn't understand why fish can breathe under-water. You can continue to insult me all you want, I don't care, but honestly, there are good reasons why stock options are taxed at 50%, even if you can't understand why that is. Instead of telling other people to visit the real world, perhaps you could re-visit the tax side of your apparent training, as right now you get an "F". As for constantly bleating about Harper and his deficits, I agree, he shouldn't have been running deficits in the past few years, and I think you would agree that at least part of that reason was the cut in the GST. I think that the Conservatives have made some bonehead decisions, for sure. However, look at who else ran in 2011. One guy lied about the fact that he was dying (Layton should have made full disclosure on that, and it was dishonest but typical NDP to deceive the voters) and the other guy was just visiting. But that's all past history. The big question is, and yet I still am not getting much of an answer, are the other two guys any better? At least Trudeau was honest, while Mulcair chose to lie, on the question of deficits. I think that the next few weeks, the NDP are heading back to oblivion where they belong, and Trudeau only gets stronger. As it should be. Post something that shows stock options are a common form of renumeration for Canadians. You cant. Because they arent. good grief, this is like talking to a piece of wood. Ok then, how about this? Why are stock options currently taxed at only 50%? Were the people that decided on this course of action just plain stupid? Is the NDP and people like you just so much smarter than everyone else? There must have been some logic to it. All I see from the NDP and you is bitterness towards others who receive this deduction, and some fixation with almond milk. If it's so dumb and only this small little band of evil rich people get the deduction, then why didn't the Liberals get rid of it back in Paul Martin's time? Just curious if you can figure it out, though I'm not holding my breath.

The group responsible for the lie that Mr. Dee has been parroting on here about "Health Care cuts" is now in trouble with Elections Canada. Go figure. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/lawn-signs-first-registration-second-for-health-care-advocacy-group-1.3208074

Ummm it was applied correctly, and ummm it showed how hypocritical you were to go after me just because I have the audacity to not like the NDP very much, when it's obvious the Dippers here are just as close-minded, and even more so, to the point of posting blatant lies to try and shore up their horrible party's position.

This is the only part of your entire post that made much sense. You claim to know a lot about this area, and yet whenever you talk about it, you sound like a Marine biologist who doesn't understand why fish can breathe under-water. You can continue to insult me all you want, I don't care, but honestly, there are good reasons why stock options are taxed at 50%, even if you can't understand why that is. Instead of telling other people to visit the real world, perhaps you could re-visit the tax side of your apparent training, as right now you get an "F". As for constantly bleating about Harper and his deficits, I agree, he shouldn't have been running deficits in the past few years, and I think you would agree that at least part of that reason was the cut in the GST. I think that the Conservatives have made some bonehead decisions, for sure. However, look at who else ran in 2011. One guy lied about the fact that he was dying (Layton should have made full disclosure on that, and it was dishonest but typical NDP to deceive the voters) and the other guy was just visiting. But that's all past history. The big question is, and yet I still am not getting much of an answer, are the other two guys any better? At least Trudeau was honest, while Mulcair chose to lie, on the question of deficits. I think that the next few weeks, the NDP are heading back to oblivion where they belong, and Trudeau only gets stronger. As it should be.

Actually, they are not supported by fact, and they are fabrications. We just exposed one of your many fabrications not too long ago in fact, in which you posted that Harper has cut $36 billion from health care. That's just pure unadulterated bullshit. And that's one of the main reasons I have a huge "bias" towards the NDP, they just lie, cheat and steal, constantly. I could go into an anecdote or two about the horror stories I head this weekend about the Manitoba NDP and the unbelievable mismanagement they are committing right now, according to people who are currently working inside the government, and I could talk about how a lot of NDP stooges are flocking to Alberta as the Alberta NDP ramps up hiring to vastly increase their government bureaucracy to become as bloated as Manitoba, but I know my story is going to somehow end up being re-spun about almond milk for some reason. I don't care if you don't want to vote for Harper, just don't for the horrible money-wasting economy-destroying NDP. They are a disease.

You can't be serious... Geez man, it seems sometimes, not always, that anytime a person posts something that runs counter to what you believe, you respond with these type statements. The hypocrisy is dripping here. I think some of us take more of an eclectic approach to politics and sensitive issues by not branding our ideologies as left, center or right. We take it issue by issue using the best facts available to form our perspectives. We sometimes don't get it right but always try to take an evidence-informed approach, identifying any bias's we may have a long the way. We can't brand ourselves with only one political strip but we can always aspire to be a sound critical thinker hopefully adding value to the discussion.