Jump to content

wbbfan

Members
  • Posts

    25,089
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    94

Everything posted by wbbfan

  1. I expect us to do some thing wild lol
  2. They supported him a lot at rt.
  3. Whoah shanks? Really good prospect ol but not who I thought would go on top
  4. I think so to. Maybe Newell but probably not.
  5. Yeah I didn’t expect that tbh. We’d pass on Newell though we got Jake n co lmao Riders should take rourke haha SAAD like him not better than Newell imo
  6. Some one ask taman to consult the napkin Rolodex Dickensen highway speed - football term 😅 Two WRs in the top 3 Imagine if Newell fell to us…
  7. Yeah I think he misses camp but likely will be up here this year. I view that as a next year pick.
  8. Watch Ted draft all the u of m guys since he took all our free agents lol
  9. Don’t you put that evil on me Ricky bobby! lol for real though. I think it’ll be ssk, edm, or us. For us I think we might reach but will likely get good talent atleast Woah stamps go Alford. Love that kid and his talent. Surprised but not by any means a bad pick.
  10. That’s a hell of a lot of snaps for globals So who is the first team to make a WTF pick? The stamps are the least deserving team ever to get a bunch of high picks
  11. nailed it. But some how barker is ever worse lol. Totally trying to be that guy though.
  12. Start of the cfl draft coverage first thing Farhan says is the former 6th pick in ford, and the rest of us have never been near a draft board… Lapo is at the table /facepalm
  13. That’s a lot of quantity, not much quality. 1 guy who belongs on a cfl ar. Hope so
  14. Interesting move, we gave up decent value and took Bailey an athletic edge tweener who will be in camp but I don’t think he has tremendous upside. More of a high floor guy imo. Peterson is a solid small but thick athletic back. I guess we wanted a guy like that but didn’t want to use a pick this year that could feed a need better. don’t love giving up on Sampson.
  15. Honestly, any of our top 4 picks in this draft could be starters and should be excellent picks. Idc so much where we extra futures or where we grab immediate production, as long as we make good picks and im sure we will in the top half. Avoid rb qb lber in the top half and it’ll be hard to miss.
  16. For me, Sénécal. He can be molded into a rb/wr super sub who also does short yardage duty, and can run a package like streveler if you want. I don’t see near enough incentive to flip the qb ratio, and I don’t see the upside or polish in the rest of the QBs that is any thing you can’t easily find in imp rookie free agent QBs at all times. none cheat answer, if I had to take one qb as a qb it’d be elgersma. I think he has better mobility (especially after the acl for rourke) better size, and more arm talent. I like him as well as a project guy, especially since he’s been in our camp before and is extremely familiar with the organization.
  17. coakes* sorry my auto correct hates his name. i think 3rd would be early for him. but if some one is really high in him and the linemen run goes deep and early he could go there. I also think he’s tremendous value in the 4th. 4th round is kind of the start of the draft getting wild teams don’t worry about reaching any more at that point. If we could get him in the 4th or 5th that would be excellent. He isn’t going to be ready for tc start, and he doesn’t have the athleticism the top and 2nd tier guys do. But I think he’s an extremely high floor guy. Normally he’d be a top 5 ol, and the pro ready pick (if 100%). But this draft is deep at ol with tons of big athletic guys and that hurts his placement.
  18. Hopefully less kids sitting on the bench is d2 or fringe d1 schools.
  19. I could see us targeting Winnipeg’s Gavin Coates. He’s an excellent inside prospect with size to play G but a natural C. Nasty and explosive, not as rangy but still good to get to the second level. This draft has a few guys who could stick at RT too. Which is a tremendous value.
  20. Its true I think we can get useful ok in rounds 3/4 that would normally be late first guys. If Fortin fell to us in the first I’d take him, I’m high on him. Other wise yeah if we use picks in the 2-4 range to get an ol or two we will be in good shape. I’d love to get Pyle in the 4th or 5th. Yep, the big difference is intangibles. Which are a big deal especially to us. But the guy we like the most might be available in the 3rd or 4th. I feel like lber is a trap pick. We’ve seen lots of guys high in the draft and few who’ve brought value. Db is interesting though. Rb is interesting. A mid pick on a guy with versatility who is a runner first and fore most would be great. Even if they sit for a year on the pr. we need a ni dl who is rotational after Lawson because we are strapped for dis and need to keep guys protected like Willy.
  21. Honestly I think edm is the browns equivalent these days. None of these guys are known to be toxic waste heaps either. Just the guys I think are held higher in the ranking by pundits than will be by teams.
  22. All of the QBs especially Elgersma and also oshinubi imo.
  23. Depends on when the linemen run begins. We have a ton of top end talent available at a bunch of positions. The linemen run should start 2-3 picks before us. Which should leave us in a great spot to get a guy we will be very happy with.
×
×
  • Create New...