Wanna-B-Fanboy

B.C. SUCKS!

Agrred! The best reply in that thread:

Reading through the replies to that tweet... just made my day. BC tears will sustain me until the 13th.

Give em the old Durante treatment.

Huh, and here I thought my kindergarten teacher's name was Madame Lise...

That is one sage and wise man.

Uhg, I can't wait until next week when these games actually matter... glorified end of season preseason games...

BC with the unvictory formation...

Dru's gotta stop staring down his receivers...

Oh no... not Cottoy.

Ah ****, I hope Lucky's okay- hate to see that

51 with the mugging...

Fify

I LOVE Buck's play calling this drive...

I am so done with the Rourke love in... All non-Bomber fans about Rourke: Every Bomber fan

Tired of guachum- dude is being a whiny ***** and looking like marino out there...

He sure is a good player. He totally deserves attention... but I think most are done with the over-the-top-farhankeepingtabsonyourbathroomhabittweets-reamsofinkspilledallover-thirsty-gottagetmyclickbaitgoing-kidcanda-captaincanuck-shouldbemoprigtnow-holyfuckimsodonehearingaboutthiskidstuff. I know I am.

God save us all

Says nothing about the tam having to lock into an option year. the player is locked in. If BC wants to stick it to Rourke, then they make him honour that OPTION year 3 at the stated grid you pointed out. What people here are saying, is that if BC was fair, they would negotiate a new contract with Rourke that would be a fair starter top end salary and once they get the agreement on the new contract... they would let the old contract expire without exercising their option for a 3rd year on the old contract, and then sign the new fair starting QB contract. It sucks because these contracts are geared majorly towards the team's best interest... I think they had it in place to make draft picks and their investment into them more valuable. Anyways, I see your point- if BC exercises its option for a 3rd year, Rourke has to take it @ the salary grid mentioned. The point you seem to be at odds with is whether BC can let the rookie contract expire after only 2 years if they decline to opt for the 3 year option- they can, hence why it is an option year. It would be more accurate to call it a 3 year team mandated option year... ANyways- no flaming - just thoughtful discussion and clarification. I do appreciate the discussions you bring to the forum.

I think that's why it is called an option year... meaning the team can either pick up the optional 3rd or opt for the option of not taking that option... I don't see how that is not clear as day, unless of course you take the blinders option or opt for the "new English" option of the word option. No skin off my nose with which ever option you choose- it is ultimately your option. I am just letting you know that you have options here.

There are many on this board who want the riders to give CD one more chance, let CoFaj continue to start, etc. Count me as one of them...