All Activity

ZC has earned it...what had JT done to earn it...longevity due to a hc who is a fan and thinks he adds something doesn't carry any currency

I know the reason for certain players JT ZC for example is ride and die with them, they've earned that respect, that right even if it costs the team. Half of me really admires that, half of me not so much.

Watching them...eye test...throwing motion...pocket presence...Wilson actually looks best...has best arm too...just needs reps But.....as we know....we have Osh...its his way or no way...and he will not use a guy over a vet...a fav....or a guy he still thinks is the bees knees

Who knows. But maybe cuz pre season. I’m not even sure. Give our draft picks some reps on D. What is that about. That’s a weird one. Were those Kyle picks and Osh not a fan?? I mean why ain’t they getting reps on D. Wilson? He’ll get his reps when both Zach and Strev are in the icu.

Teams figured it out late last yr...and refined it this yr....we adjusted nothing ...and didnt upgrade guys to play it right outta the gate...

OL is only as good as the weakest link and kolo is extremely weak. He’s broken. That’s the problem.

I said that the day he was announced...a piss poor choice...zero experience at even a half assed university level...a lazy internal promotion and we'd pay for it....and yup...we paying And be open minded and realize...u can allocate yiur ratio anyway u want...not concrete spots like we have...even when they not best option Find best players...then work your ratio...we assbackwards

Or, as some have posted here, TW is not good enough, CS and ZC are the best we have. If factual, wtf is he doing on our roster then? If we are reluctant to play our depth because they’re not good enough help me understand how that is not a huuuge problem.

Yeah not talked about enough is the D is schemed like they still have BA and Bighill running things. I’m not sure I’m a fan of the very little pressure on purpose D. It doesn’t seem to be working cuz we lack the talent. How many sacks do we have. I’d assume there are players on other teams who have more or close to what we have. That’s a problem. Younger scheme not as effective as Richie.

If we had a top dline...pressure defwnce and scraped the 8..9 men in coverage...even with this Canadian high-school offensive playbook...i bet we are at least a 9 win team right now Or draft legit Canadian reciever prospects...and not these special teams only guys....anyone can play st's...

Yeah. Looking around it’s the backup in Hamilton and maybe MBT. hopefully Elgersma comes up here soon. Not an awful idea. Seems to be a few Canadians available every year.

Sterns would be perfect with that group and another legit 1a/b There will be guys available...id even target the 2 best Canadians and go 3 Canadians and save the import spot for dline

Mistakes shouldn’t be repeated.

our lines are bad... that's why the team is bad... if you could magically make our DL and OL top notch and leave everything else as is... this team would be in the mix for 1st again... Seriously though... what do we have to lose starting Terry Wilson next game??? Accidentally finding a good QB?

Or Jake....kolo... Yeah...I am of same thought...I will pass final judgement after camp...with real coordinators....some legit offensive players...all we can do really...nobody is gonna trade us their starter

Yup. We now have 3 guys on O tho. Brady Demski and Pokey. Sterns was also looking solid before getting hurt so 4 plus Wallace and Vanterpool and Randolph on the oline. Almost there. Another big play receiver and a couple OL should be on the off season priority list. Along with DL.

I dunno. Maybe creating rivalries will draw more fans. Maybe next time Toronto plays Edmonton more ppl will care. Who knows. MLSE don’t market them so maybe Dinwiddie is trying his way.

ZC has always needed top notch protection to be effective. He moves well but he rarely gets rid of the ball quickly. He also needs more guys who are effective downfield. This year's struggling offense is not a surprise at all. If not for warriors like Olievera and Demski, it'd be dire straits.

Oh I think no. I was just saying for QB Zach has been our best. I think we are screwed at that spot

does he have another game in him though? do we go for concussion no4 this year?

Collaros has not been great but he has been better than Streveler.

I agree with most, Strev. Looked bad.....but so did Zach for the most part......I can't fully defend Strev. but our offence has been garbage all year.....including Brady's usage. I really believe the issues are far deeper than Strevelor...far deeper

I'd prefer that we move on from Streveler. He's never going to be a starter. He's struggling as a backup. Hypothetically he could be a CFL Taysom Hill but I feel his salary is better spent elsewhere and I also fear that if he stays he'll be penciled in as the #2.

Whatever the method, both lines need to be upgraded. That much is obvious.

From the Winnipeg Free Press (posted online yesterday evening by Taylor Allen) about the Bombers’ OC, “the last time he was the head offensive coordinator was nearly a decade ago at a secondary school in Laval.” I’ll give my head a shake and leave it at that.