Ducky Posted March 9, 2016 Report Share Posted March 9, 2016 Isn't that the first one after their ELC expires? An ELC can't be considered an SPC can it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted March 9, 2016 Report Share Posted March 9, 2016 As I understand it, the SPC is pretty much the cookie cutter template that all contracts are based on. It defines player obligations, practice requirements, etc.... You fill in the blanks with salary, one-way / two-way, NMC, NTC, etc. All contracts must be based on the SPC, including ELC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted March 9, 2016 Report Share Posted March 9, 2016 But if an ELC were an SPC, they would both be eligible for salary arbitration now or maybe next year and they aren't? I think that when they become eligible for arbitration has to be taken into consideration when negotiating a deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted March 9, 2016 Report Share Posted March 9, 2016 8 minutes ago, Ducky said: But if an ELC were an SPC, they would both be eligible for salary arbitration now or maybe next year and they aren't? I think that when they become eligible for arbitration has to be taken into consideration when negotiating a deal. Scheifele's first year was only 4 games so I don't believe that year counts. That means each of them have 3 years in the NHL. I believe they both signed under 21 years old, so that means they don't have the 4 years needed for arbitration. One more year each and they will be eligible for arbitration. So next contract. Brandon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted March 9, 2016 Report Share Posted March 9, 2016 If that is true, no way would I bridge either of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted March 9, 2016 Report Share Posted March 9, 2016 2 minutes ago, Ducky said: If that is true, no way would I bridge either of them. 4 years NHL experience and you get arbitration rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted March 9, 2016 Report Share Posted March 9, 2016 Scheif very comparable to Barkov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted March 9, 2016 Report Share Posted March 9, 2016 So, Bogo had arbitration rights? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted March 9, 2016 Report Share Posted March 9, 2016 13 minutes ago, Ducky said: So, Bogo had arbitration rights? Before the last contract he signed? Yes. Ducky 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted March 9, 2016 Report Share Posted March 9, 2016 wow, Barkov got 6 x 5.9m and he isn't even as good as Scheifele. Lawless did a good comparison of players over their ELC contracts and only Taylor Hall will end up with more points after Scheifele's ELC ends. Here is that group and some of the salaries he mentioned....some of these contracts were signed a few years ago but you can get the idea. Hall 7 x 6m. Couturier 6 x 4.333m Landeskog 7 x 5.75m Skinner 7 x 5.75 Seguin 6 x6.75 Johansen RNH 7 x 6m Huberdeau Galchenyuk Zibanized Yakupov Granlund Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now