Floyd

GOOOODDDDBBBYYYYYEEEE WWWWIILLLLLYYYYY!!!!! YEESSSSSS!!!!!!!

KEEEVVVVVIIINNNN GLLLLEEEENNNNN!!!!!! YYYEEESSSSSS!!!!!!!!

Wonder if Connor Halliday is tired of sitting at home.

Felt like Hall was sending Leggett more last game... rather see that than Harris

I say we trade Westerman for Logan Kilgore. Straight up.

I agree completely. I think Loffler made a big difference in that game... having confidence in this reads and not starting plays back peddling, that's huge. Very excited about a QB free thread.

Sorry, drawing a blank. Do you have a link to something interesting you've posted...?

Let's imagine what would happen if the argument was flipped... if Willy had just won a game with a late game TD drive... 'Willy played decent and we broke an 1 win in 17 loss legacy but I think Nichols is a very solid backup, he'll get in the game sooner or later. He's due for a win. That guy was great a couple years ago, great guy to have on the team. Oh, right, and Willy is still our starter for next game... forgot about that guy' If Willy had won in Edmonton, we'd be planning the fkn grey cup parade. ha

I'm assuming this is directed towards me... and I'm taking nothing personally. You've been the most vocal complainer about the 'state of this forum' - not anyone else until BFFC on this thread... All I've said is that this is the worst I've seen a forum in while, so many threads derailed - mostly by the pro-Willy crew to be honest... and then blame others. Its like the IMWT thing all over again.

Ah, of course. Then your post makes complete sense... its so weird that no one seems to do that anymore if its such a great strategy. Or maybe its a really stupid idea and everyone realized that teams should find a good QB and let him get some rhythm. Toss up really.

You derail the thread and then correct the guy who's trying to bring it back... that's like OCD overload.

Frustrating how it seems people add words or meanings to posts around here isn't it.

Hey thanks. I'll be back in October... I always come back, sigh. Besides, if I wasn't a sucker for punishment, I wouldn't be cheering for the bombers.

I wish that was true... but I believe Walters gave Willy a pretty substantial signing bonus, could be wrong.

And you are? Sorry but I honestly can't recall having any interaction with you, man... are you a Mike buddy? Anyway, I don't believe in saying stuff online that I wouldn't say to someone's face. To each their own. Let's just revisit this once someone starts a sign Mitchel Gale Thread in the off-season...

John White - 4 for 8 yards... a Bomber D that can shut down the run, when does that ever happen

When? I don't remember the bombers ever doing this... or any teams really...

I'm not upset... just worn out. Again, you're changing the narrative... you missed the rest of the thread where you just kept beating the backup LB point until the thread died... I do believe that your backup imports should be able to play multiple positions but I also like our Cdn depth and I think that yes some backups are fine just playing ST - not everything is black and white. But you have this way of taking aspects of a post and just pushing them to the extreme. You do it to TBurg all the time. Its exhausting to be honest. I don't complain about other posters - mostly just you ha. I called out Atomic and Mr Perfect because they called me out. I never call people idiots or yell WRONG when someone slips up. That's your thing. Either way, I've got a contract starting up on Monday... forum is all yours... just remember who had to be the one to start a Richard Harris tribute thread.

$400k equals a pretty short leash for Nichols...

My point is that only a handful of posters frame their opinions in a fashion that 'if you don't agree, you are clearly an idiot ha ha'... Most recently, it was 'if you think Willy is the problem, you know nothing about football'... Its predictable that you would try to flip the narrative... It was actually Mr. Perfect that set me off - you're right I should have ignored him... because as a mod, he just erased my reply to a very personal attack. I have nothing against Atomic - but I never suggested trading Westerman for Gale. This is similar to an argument last week... I talked about potential for Waggoner to play SAM if Leggett was hurt, which is not the best idea but was interesting... instead you turned the whole thread into a debate about Tony Burnett - which was a very minor aspect of the original post. This happens a lot with you.