Jump to content

rebusrankin

Members
  • Posts

    11,125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by rebusrankin

  1. Suitor would call them the Canadian Armed Forces.
  2. What kind of doughnut? Tim Hortons? Oh Doughnuts? Vital info is missing for this bet.
  3. Exciting news on the financials. This seems to sum up what we're all feeling:
  4. This obsession with QBs going early in mocks needs to stop.
  5. So this is Calgary's half time show for their game against us on July 3. https://www.stampeders.com/2025/04/07/bret-michaels-to-perform-at-stampede-bowl/?fbclid=IwY2xjawJhSnlleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHk9IUaDN1xNXM-plkRSMhOjnntzBJFuuNEzCgw4lWeStEiiWqDXn9sgEFqOB_aem_qM8xIiUr02ayKgfrrvB-EQ
  6. There goes the dream of the most expensive secondary in CFL History.
  7. All those people were from Surrey? I kind of doubt that.
  8. Brown was in his first year starting, ZC is a vet. ZC had the best running back in the league. Brown had Armstead who was ok and Laborn who was meh. Lawler/Demski/Wilson/Woli or Hardy/Rhymes/Acklin/Pimpleton? I'd go with the former. Winnipeg had the better defense. I'd argue Brown was better.
  9. Coming soon to Edmonton, the return of Ricky Ray as QB. 🤣
  10. That mock by Marshall Ferguson doesn't make a lot of sense. II get the OL pick in round one but Rourke at #15 instead of a WR (Ethan Jordan) or a DL or LB? It makes no sense. As @JuranBoldenRules stated Rourke is already beat up physically, likely tries the NFL and may never come here. Terrible option at 15.
  11. Not sure if this is a Bomber question or a CFL question. What do our draft experts think of U of M QB Jackson Tachinski, specifically his move to receiver? Worth a flyer in later rounds?
  12. That wind coupled with our strong second half of the season had me thinking we were the team of destiny until that got cruelly dashed.
  13. I like ZC but he's had some playoff stinkers. He stabilized things and helped us win in 2019 but the offensive engine was Harris without question. Heck Harris helped us get back in 2021 with a great WF. ZC was clutch in OT in the 21 GC though.
  14. If he's the best option, then fine. I just suspect that we have better american options. BTW I hate everybody. No discrimination against the GTA.
  15. Kowalski, do you mean Kolankowski? Fine sub Kolo for Wallace as a second Nat OL. Kelly shouldn't be starting at S.
  16. The draft is going to be huge for depth. Hopefully we land at least 3 guys who can contribute this year. As well, hopefully guys like Sampson and MCI can play a larger role in year 2.
  17. I did leave off a C and its most likely we go Nat at C and Wallace may not start.
  18. Neufeld, Wallace, Demski, Brady, Clercius, Lawson, Kramdi
  19. We don't have 9 or 10 Canadians who should start.
  20. Losing a 1st and a 2nd, plus a fine for finishing 3rd and losing in the first round of the playoffs. Way to go BC. Calgary getting 2 extra picks for being incompetent is foolish.
  21. Said it before curious how we'd go only 2 Canadian OL which would mean starting 5 on offense and 3 on defense. Defense the one linebacker spot makes sense with Kramdi, in theory you get a second spot at DT with Lawson and Jake but the third is then what S with Kelly? Not a complaint mind you but a curiosity point right now.
  22. So you feel he's the next star Canadian WR? Interesting choice, Demski is aging and I like Clercius but he seems more solid Canadian than future superstar (not that there's anything wrong with that)
  23. Old man moment, I know some of those bands. I'm more with it than I thought.
×
×
  • Create New...