Bigblue204

Good points I suppose. Still I'm not sure I'm convinced the D would have improved. Maybe the O would have been able to carry them a bit more had Adams been in there.

Honestly, the best thing for this Defence (besides ditching Hall) might be Bond going to the NFL( asumming that happens) allowing a CND to play LG.

not much. Which is why this season was a bit of a disappointment for me. Not really. I mean 12-6 is great. But with the way the season started, the way they were playing in the first half of the year I was convinced they would only continue to improve as the colder weather came on. I posted about it often, how they hadn't played their best game yet (back in august). and that they were only going to get better....turns out they had played their best.

which game was his punting that bad? Unequivocally? His punting was fine basically all season, save for maybe one or two shanks.

Only Rec I'd like to see back at TC are Adams, Dressler, Givens and washington (I know, I think he deserves another shot though). The rest we should be able to find something better.

Nichols is playing, you're all too high!!

We've been over this on the forum already. It's Mind bottling.

I love bob. But could do with brown. I find he is always trying to sound smart. He will say the same thing 4 different ways. In a perfect world. Walby would join cjob and brown would go bye bye.

I honestly think this is a bit of a show by the bombers. And i predict nichols breaks a 40 yard run on the first play of the game!! ?

If you had a rebutal you would list it. Instead you put words in my mouth (im all for debates) and call names.

Actually lankford flat out admitted he ran some shitty routes. And when you have multiple rec. In the same area thats also bad route running. When other rec. Drop a ball they can be let off ie Dressler/adams cause they actually produce. The rec.(the 3 i mentioned, which isnt all of them) Im talking about have all dropped passes that hit them in the numbers and gone on to do **** all. And the majority of the time its been Nichols throwing to them. This isnt a new problem. And i dont care what you're telling me. If the receivers arent catching, or getting open the issue isnt ONLY the qb.

I'll save my overall judgement of lapo for next year. He seems to have 2 years of decent production and then things start to unravel. That's kinda been his MO

If it's a dropped pass that means the player should have caught it but didnt. Passes that arent anywhere near the players aren't dropped. Its really not that hard to distinguish the two. "Give me break!!!" And i dont know who you have been watching all year but washington denmark and lankford all have been guilty of running some questionable routes this year. Which is admittedly odd for denmark. But I've paid close attention to him the last few home games and something isnt right.

He also hasn't had the weapons he's used too. I know he's been hurt, but I also think he's come back down to earth a little.

You won't find a politician willing to tackle these, unless they have a 1 and done election goal. Those projects are too big and cost too much for anyone to want to put their own name on them. Same reason they've been an issue for going on 30 years now.

dropped passes are dropped passes. Bad routes are bad routes. It doesn't matter who is delivering the ball.

Not sure it would have mattered. His lateral movement has taken a dive this year. Doesnt seem to have the quick feet he used too. Still ******* strong though.

that was kinda the joke there bub.

Um so they didn't run the play? They just said "this is a bad choice, so you can have the ball now bombers". Bad decision or not, it was still a takeaway, still a play the bombers made and the stamps didn't. I can agree with the messam thoughts, though he didn't do much at all when he was just running north/south.

I'd like to see them attack the ends with the run. Stay away from the middle and make Willis think.

I can't! I will not! your banished bruh

I just noticed your signature on the bottom there. He was trying to make me bet (something I don't do). Guess I should have taken it though, would have covered the beer for the WEST semi final, eh @Kluchk?

So when the right players where put in place, the schemes started working. It's almost like you need good players AND good coaches to be successful.

On the schedule it's showing on TSN 1 3 4 5

I see what you mean, but I have a hard time believing the team is the highest scoring team in spite of the OC. That makes very little sense, if any at all. Maybe an argument could be made if they have the fewest amount of points...but that's not the case. You don't lead the league in anything (in a positive manner anyway) without good coaching.