-
Posts
10,572 -
Joined
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Everything posted by Atomic
-
Might cast some shade, but that's not such a big deal, and a total non-issue at night.
-
It's crazy how quickly it's going up.
-
I think I would agree, in general. Guys like that "Mosaic" clown deserve everything they get but in the more recent case of a guy like szaroz71 or whatever his name is, he is just joining the conversation and shouldn't be insulted out of the building.
- 102 replies
-
- riderfans
- bluebomberfans
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Congratulations. All hail our glorious, infallible leader. Now get in line.
-
Around the League - Regular Season Discussion (Redux)
Atomic replied to BigBlue's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I wonder how many other CFL players we would be able to say that about if they faced the same media scrutiny as Manziel. -
Around the League - Regular Season Discussion (Redux)
Atomic replied to BigBlue's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
That seems a little heavy-handed. A single accusation of domestic violence and you can never play in the league? Not a conviction, but an accusation? I'm not sure that's the right way to handle things. -
This is a great point as well. McDuffie led the league in KO return average last year and didn't look like anything special in the couple games he's played for Ottawa this year... a full 7 yards lower per return, albeit in a small sample size. Is it the cover teams or the returner? I have a feeling that any of our other options would be putting up solid kick return averages as well.
-
Well. The Bombers are tied for second in terms of kickoff return average and Lankford is third among guys with 15 or more returns. So I have a hard time saying he's the best, statistically. And when I watch him return I'm not so sure he's the best either. He does well... But not the best. I think moving the offence consistently is more important than the 2-5 yards per return we may or may not lose by substituting someone else for Lankford on kick returns.
-
Well the Shallcross guy seems like a real piece of work, that's for sure
-
Yeah I don't think you can talk about the Attitude era without mentioning the sexual aspect of things led by guys like Godfather, Val Venis and to a lesser extent Goldust. That was a huge part of what made the Attitude era what it was.
-
Even the best coaches make mistakes. i'm not saying this particular move is necessarily a mistake but it's always fair game to question professional GMs and coaches. 8 of the teams don't win the Grey Cup every year so 8 teams with professional GMs and coaches are making more mistakes than the guys who won the Cup.
-
He has caught one deep ball all season, I don't think opposing DC's are all that worried about him. I'll take the heavily-involved first-down machine over the deep-threat decoy all day. And Lankford is not the best kick returner in the league... I simply can't agree with that.
-
Whatever the reason is, the production has to be better. Last 3 games he has had 2 catches for 40 yards, 0 catches, and 1 catch for 5 yards. He is being targeted... but less than 60% are resulting in catches... worst among Bomber receivers. It's been clear that Nichols and Lankford aren't quite on the same page. Whether that's on Lankford or Nichols, I can't say, but Nichols is hitting his other receivers at a 65%+ rate. Meanwhile we potentially remove a guy in Thorpe who had 5+ catches in each of his first 5 games before an off-game against Montreal. Many of which were key second down conversions and late-game drive extending plays. Dressler and Darvin Adams are both good deep threats. We don't need Lankford in the lineup with Dressler back, we need a good possession guy who can grind out YAC. Pulling out Thorpe for a guy who regularly makes only 0-2 catches per game is going to be a mistake.
-
**** there were a lot of good wrestlers in the attitude era. You're right. But still, as a kid in middle school, the Godfather introduced me to pimps and hoes and it was insanely popular. That's one thing that I know is true.
-
Tough to keep it up if the RB is averaging less than 5 yards and putting us in 2nd and long.
-
Let's not forget that the WWE HoF isn't about wrestling ability or championships or any other tangible quality. It's about popularity first and foremost.
-
Probably for the best. All the French people laugh at us for having a company named MTS
-
People liked the ho-train and the character and everything that went along with it. Keep in mind the main audience at the time was adolescent boys. Either way, he was a huge part of the attitude era and absolutely HoF-worthy. If you had to pick five wrestlers who defined that era, he would be one of them.
-
Best I could find was this: Not sure how reliable it is but seems reasonable for 2003.
-
How so? Lankford came into the starting lineup when Dressler got injured. Denmark was already in the lineup.
-
He also had a short stint as Kama Mustafa in the Nation of Domination. But you're right. Godfather is one of the most iconic figures of the Attitude Era. The ho-train. Pimpin ain't easy. Yeah you're never going to see that again, lol.