17to85

You think there was any evidence upon review for it to be a reception by the receiver?

They've buggered up so many calls and got bad press seems like the standard now is just don't over turn anything... which is a bad way to do it to. Get it right or get rid of reviews entirely.

White never caught the ball so the ruling was wrong... it's either incomplete or, the correct call, an INT. There was no simultaneous catch or any of that nonsense. White missed the catch and Alexander had possession.

And Brady has no touchdowns.... God the crap thus offense is producing despite all the big salaries....

How not? The Hamilton receiver never had possession of that ball... and since it didn't hit the turf the only possible explanation is that Alexander caught the ball therefor an interception.

Western teams taking turns absolutely crapping their pants this season.

Yeah no one blames Rourke for wanting to go to the NFL, it's the attitude where the CFL was an unforseen detour that rubs people the wrong way. A lot of guys may think it... but very few say it, especially when the national media is hell bent on shoving that person down our collective throats as the greatest canadian ever!

That's how they used to do it right? When it was first implemented... and it sucked then too. The problems from my perspective are pretty straight forward.... the CFL made reviews subjective and it caused them to make bad calls, and now that it's become a problem for perception they are knee perking trying to fix things. Just get back to basics, making sure the correct call is made.

For the money being spent on o they are bad this year.

Well we got at least one American on the PR right?

To me it was proven wrong really clearly....

Do they just have too many absolutely terrible refs?

The non over turn on the int was just laughable because the Hamilton receiver never caught the ball. Went through his arms and Alexander clearly had possession. It's either incomplete or a turnover and it never hit the ground...

I like ugly wins more than ugly losses... but man that was NOT a well played game.

Because cfl refs are worse than the Bombers offense.

No one in the cfl has the patience to run the ball that much.

Calling them media is generous... but yeah disgusting attempt to polish Rourkes turd of a game. They'd be better for implying admitting that he never should have played that game.

Oh no..... Anyway

More of a Brett Hull Canadian.

Still cashed the cheque though.

It's ridiculous how good that group has become. They're on returners like a fat kid on a smartie. If we had a punter could boom the occasional kick teams would be a huge strength.

I'm not sure it's fine... he can work with it but it does seem to lack some pop compared to previous seasons.

also what would help this offense out a ton would be if they stop turning the ball over when they are in scoring range. Whether it's fumbles, ints or turn overs on downs.

after watching the replay of the receiver on that route I'm not blaming Collaros as much for the pick. Receiver could have ran that one better which is probably what Collaros was expecting.

Bc "**** you" MOS "no **** YOU"