17to85

The last one Pierce Brosnan did was a steaming pile of crap, I'm sure if I cared to go remember some of the Roger Moore ones I'd add to the list pretty quickly.

The team all stems from the GM. He puts his scouts in place, he hires his coach. If there's a problem on the team look no further than the guy who put the pieces in place. Now maybe you could go higher up the chain to the man who hires the GM, but for this discussion I think it's best to say that we need a better performance from our GM. If I could only replace one member of the Bombers staff it's obviously Bellefool, but if I could make 2 changes Kyle Walters is #2.

They can cite climate change all they like but that's just out and out lying. They're trying to protect their own interests nothing more. I hate when climate change is used as a political tool. Call it what it is, don't want competition for the American oil production.

It's not one specific thing, it's about not over reacting to anything. Winnipeg fans are really bad for that. Win and everything is the greatest!!11!!! Lose and everything is complete crap. Mike Kelly was right about the bi-polar nature of this fan base. A little more rationality would make things infinitely more tolerable.

As I said before, they loved Skyfall which was pretty crappy all in all so perhaps reviewers just don't know what they're talking about? I dunno see how it is I suppose.

Preseason starts early.

MURICA!

Honestly, who do you see paying more than Winnipeg? Who has the need that we do for receivers?

Hollywood fantasy... It's fun to watch & get into as a fan (which I enjoy) but nothing based on reality. A theory is just that, a theory. Therefore if that theory is used not based on scientific fact, it is therefore a fantasy. I understand. Relativity is only a theory, so it is fantasy. Gravity is just a theory. I really wish the general public understood what scientists mean when they use the word theory.

The gap between Willy and the guys backing him up, Nichols included is huge. Those close games some of them are likely wins because Willy at least was able to make some big plays here and there. Marve and Brohm couldn't do **** and Nichols was as likely to turn the ball over as make a play.

If you have everyone just positive or just negative you have a completely useless forum. You absolutely need both positive and negative outlooks. When I read the pure positive it makes me almost as frustrated as I am with coaches and management. There is nothing wrong with being positive but reading some of the positives on this forum you would think that this team is super close to being a GC team. Its confounding. I am tired of crappy and mediocre I want consistently good, meaning a winning record. I honestly believe that, with the right people in place, that can come in far less time than many of our management in the last 8 years have been telling us. Why should we wait when most other teams haven't. Yes Edmonton, Sask, and Hamilton had long runs of crappiness but when they got it all figured out it came quick and lasted more than a year. Why should Winnipeg be so different? I like positive folks but at times I think their even more deflating than negative ones. It would sure be nice if we could all go into the off season with the confidence that our Bombers will be back to actually challenge for top spots rather hoping we don't suck again. it's not about positive vs. negative, it's about the people who ***** for the sake of bitching being as bad as the blind homers. Some people will spin everything no matter how insignificant into the biggest negative going and that's just stupid.

So how did the climate change before man burned fossil fuels? Less rapidly There are past instances of faster warming than we see now. There are also slower instances. The Earth is not a static system, it's been changing constantly for the 4.6 billion years it's been around and it'll keep on changing until the sun blows up and toasts it. The sooner we realize that change isn't always a bad thing the less we can have these knee jerk reactions.

The thing with climate is that it's always been changing throughout the Earth's history and it will continue to change long after our species is gone. The good news is that we are a highly adaptable species and we can survive with a warmer climate. Maybe it causes some deaths but let's be honest the best way to actually lower pollution on the planet would be to cull a good number of humans.

No not what anyone has said, things like cap and trade are scams, Kyoto was a scam, it was a big old wealth transfer agreement. Real action is something I could get behind, but no one wants to touch real change, too difficult and too expensive. Let me ask you this, what have you personally done to lower your footprint? Or do you fall into the category of "Something MUST be done! By people other than myself"

To the bolded... LOL thank god you're not the GM. Washington is a fantastic defensive back and you'd miss him if he were gone and like it or not Moore is the teams best receiver AINEC. You don't improve a sore spot on the team by losing your best receiver. Marcus Henry was Ottawa's leading receiver last year, and although he's still on the team, I don't believe he's played a single game. I don't think they miss him on the field at all. So you basically just proved my point? You're better off pushing guys down the depth chart than cutting ties with them? Not to mention Moore was always a better player than Marcus Henry. You walk away from Moore the receivers ain't getting any better in the offseason.

so incredibly untrue, I don't even know where to begin.... just cuz someone doesn't walk up to you and slap you in the face, doesn't mean they don't exist... But this is pretty much the point, not everyone wants to do the legwork to find music and rock as a genre that gets lots of airplay in the popular mediums? Not much.

There are some theories out there that show how a warp bubble could be possible, the catch is that you'd need a power source unimaginable to us right now. So in Star Trek they came up with the fantasy power source and boom problem solved. It's all fantasy just to different degrees.

Rock died sometime in the late 80's and early 90's. Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact. u must be a grand funk railroad fan For more information on Grand Funk, consult your school library!

To the bolded... LOL thank god you're not the GM. Washington is a fantastic defensive back and you'd miss him if he were gone and like it or not Moore is the teams best receiver AINEC. You don't improve a sore spot on the team by losing your best receiver.

I know, it's pretty weird to see the mention of climate change by the government. .. Surprised that it wasn't given it's own ministry, given the gravity of it. Or... were you being sarcastic? Can't tell. He's a denier .. denier? How about someone who doesn't think it is the super serious doom and gloom event environuts want it to be? The facts are that most of what the world is doing to combat CO2 emissions is largely useless. Cap and trade scams and carbon taxes don't accomplish anything. Real action though is too costly and no government wants to get into that. Never mind that Canada could stop emitting all CO2 tomorrow and global levels would still continue to rise. We are largely insignificant in the fight against CO2 emissions.

12 weeks is the time frame I believe they are talking about but 7 or 8 weeks could be pretty likely. so 2-3 months.

Anthony Crispino, is that you? Did ya hear disss??Also Ballard was around late 80s and died early 90s I think. ******* punk kids. I'm pretty sure.....

Who says it's gotta be rock and roll? Nobody, I guess this is my own personal bias. I just find it annoying that they classify themselves as a rock act when it's not even close to rock n roll. Tweeny music. Is their any actual fans of "fall out boy" if someone can name 3 songs by this band without Google search I'll be impressed How many actual rock acts are there anymore? Not very many.

Not unless Dallas Eakins somehow sneaks into the Oilers coaching ranks. Yakupov has played well for every coach who wasn't Eakins.