Mike

Oh ok. I guess that's supposed to be funny. You must be fun at parties. Jay Detain is funny because that's what the close captioning on IGF interprets his name as. Same with Rory Dough Alert. And Demons Washing Ham. I can't wait to see what the captioning comes up with for Lirim Hajrallahu next season! The scoreboard is just going to implode.

Oh ok. I guess that's supposed to be funny. You must be fun at parties. Jay Detain is funny because that's what the close captioning on IGF interprets his name as. Same with Rory Dough Alert. And Demons Washing Ham.

Running backs are always like this. They're so used to being the star and getting what they want because after the QB, they're the big ticket guys. What they don't realize is that there are a million of them out there and supply/demand is what dictates price, not how high profile or popular the position you play is.

I'm still firmly in the camp that thinks Collaros would be better, but hey ... McManus thinks I'm wrong and I obviously hope I'm wrong too. And given my track record lately, I'm pretty sure I will be wrong.

I still think the plan for guys like Bucknor or Robertson ideally is to phase them in as the nickel back. It doesn't give you a starter, but it frees up a DI spot for a guy on offense. Especially since we're probably going to have to use a DI on a LB spot this year.

Just a question that I was pondering last night ... If it wasn't for Collaros, would Drew Willy be more of a headline signing? I get that he's still viewed as the guy going forward and I get that we're all still excited, but there's still that air of "but he's not Collaros" to the whole thing and I just have to wonder if more of us would view Willy as a legitimate option for the future if not for missing on the Collaros sweepstakes. I remember how excited we all were about Reilly last year. Reilly in 2012 REILLY, M 2012 BC 52 75 69.3 682 56 4 5.3 2 2.7 104.4 REILLY, M 2012-10-19 BC EDM 28 19 67.9 276 47 2 7.1 1 3.6 108.6 REILLY, M 2012-10-26 BC CGY 26 19 73.1 261 56 2 7.7 0 0.0 130.5 REILLY, M 2012-11-03 BC SSK 13 9 69.2 101 21 0 0.0 0 0.0 92.2 75 pass attempts, 52 completions for a near 70% completion rate and almost 700 yards. Three games with decent sample size. Willy in 2012/2013 WILLY, D 2012 SSK 69 95 72.6 709 43 5 5.3 4 4.2 93.7 WILLY, D 2013 SSK 32 52 61.5 473 45 4 7.7 1 1.92 108.9 WILLY, D 2012-09-09 SSK WPG 23 17 73.9 188 33 1 4.3 1 4.3 94.1 WILLY, D 2012-09-16 SSK MTL 34 22 64.7 225 33 1 2.9 2 5.9 68.9 WILLY, D 2013-07-27 SSK HAM 25 14 56.0 269 45 3 12.0 0 0.0 133.6 WILLY, D 2013-11-02 SSK EDM 22 15 68.2 157 26 1 4.5 1 4.5 84.9 Four games with a decent sample size for Willy and they end up comparing fairly. Seems like Drew is more experienced than Reilly was when we were so enamored with him last year and considering I was a huge Reilly booster, it makes me wonder why I don't get as excited about Willy. Saskatchewan stink? Because he comes across as option B? Nothing is guaranteed. Reilly wasn't. Collaros isn't. Willy isn't. But after thinking about it, I'm just not sure why I'm not as excited about Willy as I was about the other two. I mean really, I saw what he could do when he tore us a new one in the Banjo Bowl. We know he's capable. So what is it?

The best one was the toilet with the cheering section a foot away.

I see us signing between 5-7 of those guys. Cvetkovic and Stewart are the two I'm pretty certain on.

Curious who you're talking about because my first thought is that it's me and I haven't been absent. I'm actually bummed to see Jade go.

I wouldn't cut Cauchy. Our Canadian depth is thin to the point where we need to supply the guys we have with opportunities to bounce back. We're not exactly in a position to be picky. People are going to say "well, he's making too much money!" but really, we can afford to have a couple guys like that. Everyone can.

F is not a vowel.

PENIS JOKES

Seriously? That's bottom of the barrel, man... why not bring back Hargs instead? Not every signing has to be one worth putting a front page headline on. They can't all be Baboulas. I know right? It's so inconsistent. In one thread, he's bemoaning our lack of participation in the heated Baboulas sweepstakes and in another, he's complaining that we might be interested in Mike Bradwell.

I can't wait for our Willy to be throwing ropes all over the field at IGF.

No, it's essentially a new contract but it's deemed an extension because technically, his existing contract was overwritten seen as how it didn't expire until Monday.

Extend Willy? REALLY? Come on.

Seriously? That's bottom of the barrel, man... why not bring back Hargs instead? Not every signing has to be one worth putting a front page headline on.

Why wouldn't we see him? You think he will beat out January...? I would think January is pretty much a lock just due to his experience... I think if he's good enough, he will.

Why wouldn't we see him?

Hall really isn't that bad, he definitely appeals to me as a backup.

I'm not really that high on him, I just think that if they're going to go 3 NI receivers, even if a guy like that is semi useful, you can put him at the boundary WR and put those rebounding skills to use.

I know they want to bring Alli into camp. Could be Poblah 2.0 but could also be a starting NI receiver right out of the gate.

Ya kno, it doesn't surprise me one ounce that you already think this without even getting out of the off-season.. Stay classy bud. Keep the faith!! Forget class, sell me on all the great things that have transpired this off season. Granted, he still has many months to make it happen, but so far are you honestly impressed? Or are you just being "positive?" Oy. Can we sell you on the fact that we avoided a giant albatross of a contract on Burris; and that Hamilton and Kent Austin were a flashier sell for Collaros instead? Way too early to be passing judgment on Walters. The mess that Mack left the organization in... pile on all that you want. But way too early to judge Walters. Fair response and I appreciate you indulging my question. Still, he could've easily over paid for Burris and just cut the guy next year. I am fine with Glenn, but Desjardins is going to anally pound us for him. And Lizard is going to have to take it. Which is a great idea if you're looking to solve one problem by creating another one. If that's how he thinks business is done, he'll quickly develop a reputation that is just as bad as the one we have now. We're trying to rebuild our image as an appealing football club to join up with. Signing guys only to cut them a year later for no reason other than money troubles is not how you establish that.

I'm pretty much out of sources at this point lol I rarely get any information nowadays

Quite honestly, I have no idea how you come to your conclusions regarding offensive linemen. I'd love to hear your expanded analysis on why a guy like Baboulas is a better OL than Sorenson.