https://podcasts.google.com/subscriptions?sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi7v_Xs-tH0AhUwg4kEHeHdC9cQ6tUFegQIABAB
5:30 into the podcast, they "kind of" discussed the missed review call. MOS dances away from directly criticizing the decision.
The only good way for sports figure, like CF, to be on social media is if it's all one way and he's not reading the replies. It has to be one way, unless you have crazy mental toughness (and I doubt it ends up well, anyhow).
If it's being observed, you can make improvements. I think it would add to transparency for the fans. But, more importantly, it would add to transparency for the teams, including MOS who sits on the committee.
How can they improve the process if it's not being audited?
Same with horse racing when they're reviewing infractions (track dependent).
It gives you complete insight into what they are looking at and what they are discussing. How can they improve if they process isn't being scrutinized? Should be mandatory, IMO.
I realize why they did it.
I wonder who will get the 2024 GC? It should be the West chance again and I bet BC makes a big push to get it. I could see Edmonton, Winnipeg and BC all being interested.