Booch

he's had some chances already...gonna be 30...and has several black marks against him for being basically a knob

anything Riders?....or the 5-0 start? 😁

so there were two piles of crap created that yr?...lol

backwards too....eases it on

I hope this injury to Harris is enough to make it seem an extension to Dickyboi is warranted haha...

Imagie a worse record than last yr?...that would be so funny...and the loss of HARRIS excuse is just that...save for a few drives...he wasn't really lighting it up there...let alone putting up points and his injury was just a matter of time...smoke and mirrors there and a lucky sched to open the season...a team with a record over .500 that is actually good would not have a negative point differential

who hasnt played well in 4 yrs?...Rose was fine in 2021, and in the last games and playoff offs last yr The old boys club is the insistence of starting guys like Briggs....Kramdi...Kolo....and recently now Thomas when they shouldn't be, and its solely because they have been here for 3 yrs and more...I have no issues with any other vet that we are starting.....and not sure what All-star level guy we are taking off.....if its a halfback it wont be Nichols...and other allstars in the west ahead of any of our guys would be Milligan...Peters...Lee...Moxey...and thats just off top my head yeah u definitely would want Parker at HB

what part of this would make even the half intelligent fan fee good?....good grief....our moaning and groaning is peanuts compared to this atrocity

we need depth regardless of the Haba injury, as well...we had none...and now have worse than none....so you have to think we do some kind of roster moves Forgot about Gwachum and would be a good stop gap...and likely cost less than Lemon tho as the weeks tick on Lemons ask will be getting smaller and smaller and more limited We had/have a case of serious warts and still escaped...yes escaped at 5-2 going into the break and first place is still under our control....The game coming out of the bye is the biggest of the season, and this is the game the statement needs to be made....and definitively at that....will the staff do the required things to allow us to do that...History says yes....so we shall see

yeah should have been spotted on the 51...minimum...we got boned there Rose when healthy should be back to his corner spot....with out a question until it is apparent he is worse than the other guys mentioned....and that he is not I highly suspect

well done

yes he did...and yes I hope so

do u know that 100 percent tho...u can have combined coverage as well eh...he def bit on a double move...but also if he has nobody else there responsibility wise his responsibility is to follow that play....and as they say look for loose change on a tip..fumble..etc...I dont know the coverage called...but I do know a cb can have man coverage in the lower 3rd but if guy breaks out the HB and or safety is supposed to pick up the deep 3rd...so who knows..and we will never know cause the coach wont tell us who effed up

yeah Willie has played 7 games..has 8 sacks..2 forced fumbles...7 or 8 knockdowns...who knows how many pressures...14 tackles and generally causes fits out there, allowing us to be the league leader in sacks right now...he's doing just fine...and that was with several games with no Jeffcoat and slugs like Scmeckle and Thomas taking reps and playing with Bennett on the other side of him

there a difference between easy and lucky...or fortunate many say...media...coaches and fans that Marshall is the top corner...and that happens to him prob every other game...if not every game...guys get beat...caught peeking and or biting...nature of the position also...where was the safety there?...did the HB screw up and was supposed to take the deep zone there?....did u have inside info on the coverage called?...and going by Suitors explanation on the replay isnt the answer cause 9 times outta 10 he has no clue what he is babbling about...all he was concerned about that game was when Lawler would get a big play so he can throw out his patented "he's back!!" comment

thing is...he gets targeted a lot...by plan....sure he can hang and be close to the targeted guy....most times can wrap the guy up and take him down but the damage is done....I wanna see more explosion to break it up....Pick it off...and have a physical presence out there...maybe he should be moved to safety to be that guy who can glide and slide over to plays to give over the top support in a true safety fashion....as he is not the best option at HB ...all the good things and bad things considered...but we as a team don't use a safety that wau=y...so that would mean somewhat of a makeover in our coverages and responsibilities and at this point in the yr would be more problematic than helpfull until they got it down consistently

again...not to knock holm but a few of his knockdowns he was beat and was rewarded by a severe under thrown ball....or just bad pass in general

Teams will game plan and scheme to target areas and players where they will have the best success, its not just random willy nilly fly by seat of your pants stuff....unless you are the Elks....they go into a game with specific targets and plays based on in game situation hahah...I was actually gonna say that as well...Lawrence as well I believe had 4 or 5 knockdowns

Holm..29 tackles ADS..23 tackles BA...21 tackles Darby..20 tackles Houston...19 tackle Nichols..17 tackles Lawrence..6 tackles (3 games) that being said...some tackles can be possible attributed to run support, and being involved on a play where a guy was getting yac from a play not a direct result of them...but the correlation between targets and tackles carries merit

dont get me wrong...I dont hate Holm....he has some usefulness and possible more upside??....that not sure...but we have better in house, and if Parker didnt get hurt doubt we even having this convo

rules now dont allow it hardly anyway and almost looks like he consciously not trying to f=do it to hurt team with a penalthy...so stick him closer to the L.O.S and make plays which is normal...any team will attack the new rookie....or should until they show they can make play You can go look at tackles...if they have a high total...they have a high completion percentage against......excluding a safeties numbers as they are skewed a bit and not a good barometer....you want your safety to be involved and makibg tackles....depending on the scheme or what you have him doing means he's coming up and making plays based on his eyes

u playing silly buggers here eh?

and the fact we havnt been using him much in the true safety sense recently anyway would make sense too

BA at Sam is something I'd like to see us do...and would make better use of his skills being involved more...Never thought of Parker at safety but thats an interesting idea...he's be a picking machine I bet and a sure tackler I'd go as far to like to see Cole at safety...or given a shot....dude can cover ground and lay the lumber too

plus...he never fumbled ever in his collegiate career...dont recal any in pros yet either to this point...so he is dependable