17to85

Plug and play body with 2 guys down... not the worst thing.

As it should be.

You still missing the point... previously the D would been carved up to the tune of 50 points. Yeah they still got some kinks to figure out but they're better. We're looking at steps here, not instant 180.

Well to be fair, a marked improvement doesn't mean good... they were THAT bad previously.

Well we saw a marked improvement in the defence with a couple tweaks... not sure that the receivers in house are enough to drastically improve that group but might get a bit more with a shuffle somewhere

Head coaches pick their staff that's kind of the whole deal. I've said it before, osh deserves a statue outside the stadium, but it's looking like his ideas are old and stale and if he doesn't adapt then serious questions need to be asked about his future.

Remind me... who hired the coordinators?

And then stopped doing anything.... so what's the ******* difference? People bend over backwards to make excuses for Zach but **** all over streveler for the same problems. Ol not good enough, receivers not good enough, game plan not good enough. Been saying it for weeks now, this teams problems are less qb related and more everything else related.

I'd say it's the latter, but again, Goalie doesn't like to entertain the idea that coaches make mistakes building a roster or giving opportunities to players. Only way change happens is extended periods of flat out pants shitting or injury.

Give him a chance and if he sucks then find a damned American.

Well and if you insist on Canadians at dl, then don't waste time with a Canadian in the secondary. If you want a Canadian safety then all American on DL and get a ferocious bunch who can terrorize a qb.

Technically we lost that game because replay gave it to Toronto and then apologized after the fact.

The 2 singles aren't a big deal IMO, the complete lack of offense in the 2nd half though.... yeah that's a problem. Also giving away big plays for free on D.

From your lips to God's ears.

Unfortunately we've tried collaros twice against calgary already and it was fugly

Adding woods could have been huge for thr DL. Liked what he did last year.

Zach has gotten worse compared to 5 years ago too... you're spending all your time focusing on the problems of streveler and Wilson meanwhile just hoping that collaros can turn back the clock... Collaros will hit some more bombs right now that's true... but he will also get sacked a bunch and thrown ints as well. So I guess in your opinion you roll the dice on hitting enough deep shots to win and that being the best chance? The only, and I mean only time this team has been successful offensively the last couple seasons has been when Brady carries it on his back.

Are we sure Goalie isn't Mike O'Shea?

My exact thoughts. Untouchable for 1/3 of the season and then gone.

Disagree and that is not a not a big rah rah streveler statement. Collaros has been ass other than a few random deep shots.

Considering the complete lack of traction the O had that game you take the guaranteed points all the time. One on one is totally different if you got a 6'2 receiver on a 5' 8 db as well but when it's the other way around... just dumb.

Unless you're like me and always right

People were skeptical of the OC hire, nothing seems to have alleviated those concerns

Did someone rightly call him an idiot for that answer? I mean he knows that missing that play can lead to a turnover right? Situational awareness is huge as a coach and it was lapos main flaw

Corcoran?