kelownabomberfan

I don't recall Scheer ever being in black face and so he's no hypocrite in this situation. The only true hypocrite is Trudeau the virtue-signalling clown. And rightly so. I don't see Scheer really bringing up this issue much, it's more Canadians seeing the empty-suit we have for a PM and judging him the vacuous tool that he is. I see Jagmeet's true value in siphoning off votes from the Leftist pie from the Liberals. That's gold Gerry gold.

isn't that how he got the captaincy in the first place??

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/elections/raymond-de-souza-yes-the-worlds-a-stage-for-trudeau-and-people-are-just-his-props/ar-AAHW8C8?ocid=spartandhp

if it had been Rod Black, well that's a totally different story.

LOL - yeah. I guess so. Not really in this case. She is 40 years old for goodness sakes, so we're not exactly that far apart in age.

Thought about it as she was basically trapped when we were waiting for everyone to file off the plane but she was giving off pretty strong "I know you know who I am but I don't feel like talking to you" vibes. I have become an expert at reading these vibes via years and years of experience of being shunned by hot women. Ok, all women. "so you think Keith Urban is a good choice for the Grey Cup eh?" "You pig. Stop creeping my social media."

yeah and she's pretty hot too!

Natasha is happy about it! She also was sitting behind me on the plane this morning from Toronto to Kelowna. Not too shabby!

Tough but fair to both parties.

Andrew Coyne: Bad policy versus no policy — the real difference between Conservatives and Liberals BY ANDREW COYNE https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/election-2019/andrew-coyne-bad-policy-versus-no-policy-the-real-difference-between-the-conservatives-and-liberals/

In Toronto right now. I turned on TSN last night and they were replaying the Winnipeg Montreal game. I finally was able to see what Joe Walsh was thinking in that hotel room...

Flames sign Keith's offspring. Conner next signing?

I find it odd that you find it odd.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-climate-scientist-to-bernie-sanders-youre-killing-people-in-india Shame on you Bernie. Shame indeed.

I am not being dishonest. I would ask in return that people here pushing the apocalyptic visions to learn how to do math. Also you guys are 0-41 right now on these predictions. Why are the scientists right this time? Oh right because we aren't allowed to question those feeding us this malarkey. Right.

It's more amusing watching all the Greta Thunbergs here refusing to acknowledge what Hansen is saying. Do you have an opinion? If so what is it?

extremely poorly said, and speaking of truth, I see none in what you wrote above. You have completely ignored the basic economics of how our society operates and based your entire argument on emotion. The same people advocating for destroying our economy by immediately jumping to "renewables" (especially the never economic wind, solar and tidal power) are the same ones who can't do basic math, and should be kept as far away from the corridors of power as possible, as these are the people who are truly dangerous to the survival of mankind. What did you think of James Hansen's comments and his calling out of Bernie Sanders?

This makes me feel better...not...

I just wanted to say that I don't think that moving off of fossil fuels CAN'T be done, it's just going to take a long time and a lot of patience. James Hansen is advocating for nuclear power, and I agree with him. He's also taking issue with the current stance of the Democratic Party on man-made climate change. If we can make electronic combines powered by nuclear power, I am all in. https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-climate-scientist-to-bernie-sanders-youre-killing-people-in-india

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2005/oct/12/naturaldisasters.climatechange1 Speaking of apocalyptic events, time is running out pretty fast on the UN and their prediction of 50 million "climate refugees" by 2020. Only three more months to go!

We'd also be dead pretty quickly. 125 years ago there were 1.5 billion people on the planet (maybe, no one was counting back then). Now there are almost 8 billion. What the climate apocalyptics really want is a mass human cull. That would be the direct result of no more fossil fuels. That combine harvesting all of that wheat can't run on solar panels. Nor can the semi hauling it to the elevator. Nor can the train hauling it to the processing stations to be turned into bread. Well, maybe a few can. But 98% of us would be dead of starvation and cold by then.

One human being no. 7 billion - yes.