voodoochylde

Defence already showing their underbelly.

Zach has to set his feet and let it fly. That was there if he settles. But you can’t tell me nobody else was open when Schoen was bookended.

Defence stood up when they had to. Solid bounce back after shitty special teams play.

Good coverage by Ford.

There ya go Biggie.

Got completely turned around and Acklin SHOULD have hauled that in.

Well, there goes our d line depth.

Sanchez calling out Kolo’s shitty performance last week.

It's one of the things that made Marvin Coleman great back in the day. He was never going to be a dynamic returner in the mold of Janarion Grant but he was SUPER dependable and never lost you field position.

A couple of quick thoughts about tonight's game: Offensively and defensively the big boys need to do their job. Ottawa has a load in the interior of their defensive line, can our hogs hold up? Defensively, we need more pressure. Brown will extend plays with his legs but he's no real threat to run. Hit him. Hurry him. Get hands in his face and don't let him see the field. While I love the "go for the throat" instinct, Zach needs to be patient and not force the big play. The killshot is great but so is staying on the field and playing complementary football. Some sustained drives and not settling for 3 will be essential. Let's not rely on our special teams tonight - please? Ford needs to shake off last week and show some of what made him so intriguing when he was here last. Called it out last week and will call it out again - chemistry and communication in the secondary is still a question and it needs to improve. Will Augustine show he's more than a one trick pony? Great speed, works hard on teams and can make a defence pay but can he be a reliable target when he needs to? Can he pick up the rush and help keep Zach clean? Is he capable of getting those gritty yards to salt away a game? I think Drew Wolitarsky may have a big game. Is this the week I'm pleasantly surprised by what Mitchell brings to the team? Not counting on it.

He would be .. if he could only get out of his own way and allow the teams he's coached to keep firing bullets.

I was one of the biggest Neuf haters early on in his career here (health) but he's been a pretty steady part of that line for a long while and can play multiple positions in a pinch. Hell, at this point, I'd kick him outside as he's an upgrade over Lofton. As long as the center of our offensive line continues to routinely struggle, Zach and the offense will struggle.

The one spend that I wish Kyle would have made was to re-sign Desjarlais when he came back from the NFL (I know the decision came down to more than just money). Imagine a line right now of: Bryant Desjarlais Eli Dobson (insert right tackle here) That would be all sorts of nasty.

I guarantee I'll be having fun.

Brady is on a rookie deal? To me, making running back as big a part of your cap picture as we have, isn't the best use of resources. While I love Brady, I wasn't going to be too disappointed if another team overpaid for him because I think we could have better used that money elsewhere.

I'm talking financially.

I agree, he may get there, but to expect a raw rookie to step in .. pick up protections and help give Zach a clean pocket (or a reliable outlet) is expecting too much and simply philosophically, I don't feel RB is a position *any* team should invest heavily in - especially in the CFL.

This tells me all I need about you. There's a reason so many backs wash out of professional football (or are reduced to being just an early down thumper) .. they can't pass protect to save their lives. The CFL, by it's nature, puts a premium on backs who are multi-dimensional. Chris-Ike hasn't demonstrated that here. Augustine has never really demonstrated that here. There's a reason why Harris played over Brady .. and a reason why Brady earned the role over Augustine later.

And the sentiments a coach expresses about a player who has helped him accomplish so much means very little to me in the grand scheme of things because it's a natural human response. As a fan, I want to win and hope whomever is leading this team will make the tough decisions when they have to but I completely understand WHY O'Shea feels the way he does. So no, it doesn't bother me at all that he expressed this. I get it. What does bother me is that we aren't protecting our QB as well as we used to .. it bothers me that our offense has become fairly predictable, pedestrian and aren't giving playmakers a chance to flash .. it bothers me that we've prioritized spending at a largely disposable position instead of doing all we can to keep our pivot from taking unnecessary shots. We all watched Khari become a shell of himself because we failed to invest in protecting him .. we are seeing that play out (to an extent) with Zach. Don't get me wrong, I'm no Zach truther. I've been critical of his play and routinely called out his performance late in the last couple of seasons. I feel he is closer to the end than not but, right now, he's the least of my worries.

Don't get me wrong, I do think he's going to ride Collaros until the wheels completely fall off and, as a fan that just wants to see us remain dominant, that's disheartening but am I "extremely bothered" that O'Shea feels the way he does about Zach? Not at all. It doesn't surprise me in the least especially when you consider the success the two have enjoyed together.

Why would I be upset about a coach who thinks highly of a quarterback that helped him win back to back Grey Cups, helped lead a team to 4 in a row and will be an integral reason why O'Shea will cement himself as the all time leader in wins by a Bomber coach?

I think that if Augustine went down in game we'd see a platoon of Demski, Mitchell and likely Streveler taking reps out of the backfield. That's less than ideal and it's why we should have an American back active on our game day roster - have him there to acclimatize to the game, spell Brady and allow us to pivot effectively if our star NI goes down for a prolonged period of time.

It's not the roster I would have fielded but I do think the roster critique has become a meme at this point. There are holes but, when you look back across O'Shea's tenure here, there have always been holes in the game day roster and there's always been a reliance on his guys. This hasn't changed. I've said it before and will say it again, it's his best and worst quality. I think the real criticism is with the practice roster and Mike has already thrown out many of my own concerns there so I won't rehash them.

Rosery is the prime example of a guy they could have called up when Brady went down. He played well in preseason. Knows the offense and *could* have come in in a pinch. The other thing that bothers me about our roster is that we are completely unable to pivot away from having a NI at RB. We've invested so heavily in that position but have NOTHING in the way of an adequate backup if something catastrophic happens.